[pure-silver] Re: Scanning or duping
- From: Eric Nelson <emanmb@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: "pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 08:24:32 -0800 (PST)
You didn't mention having a dead scanner so yes shooting them would be the only
choice it seems.
________________________________
From: Jacques Augustowski <py1hy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 5:12 AM
Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Scanning or duping
Hi Eric,
The main use is to create a digital file using 35mm negatives for printing
digital negatives. If have a full frame camera and my scanner is kaput, so why
not use my camera.
On Dom 13/11/11 22:00 , "Eric Neilsen Photo" ej@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx sent:
>I'd also add, whether or not there needs
to be anything like dodge, burn, crop to be done. But first is, what is the
intended use of said copy; To show, to print, to
archive?
>
>Eric Neilsen
>Eric Neilsen Photography
>4101 Commerce Street, Suite 9
>Dallas, TX 75226
>
>www.ericneilsenphotography.com
>skype me with
ejprinter
>Let's Talk Photography
>
>
>________________________________
>
>From:pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Eric Nelson
>Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011
9:52 AM
>To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [pure-silver] Re:
Scanning or duping
>
>I
think that's one of those questions that hasn't had a direct comparison made
that I know of. I think it would come down to which scanner you're going
to use, and what the final use of the scan/copy is going to be.
>
>
>________________________________
>
>From:Jacques Augustowski
>To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Sent: Friday, November 11, 2011
7:04 PM
>Subject: [pure-silver] Scanning or
duping
>
>
>HI,
>What's
better, scan a 35mm negative on a good flat bed scanner or dupe with a high
quality digital camera and a slide copier?
>thanks
>
>
Other related posts:
