Maybe the techs at Kodak Professional are crazy but they've told me several time that the "too long in the fixing bath" issue we were all taught to fear, is a myth insofar as film is concerned. i.e. that the shadow/midtone whatever info would be lost/dissolved or whatever if fixed for too long. They said they ran tests and fixxing could be as long as 6 minutes in Rapid Fix. Given that, I standardized with 5 minutes for fixing here, and; I NEVER fix more than 30 rolls per 1/2 gallon, I use HCA with agitation (Jobo) for 1-3 minutes. A minute is fine but longer won't hurt anything, and I NEVER have purple negs whether it be T-Max or otherwise. Different films will have a different color. PlusX looks blue for example, and a stack of processed Tri-x sheet film waiting to be sleeved has that purple color, yet individually the sheets look perfect. Eric --- Richard Knoppow <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Adrienne Moumin" > <photowonder2010@xxxxxxxxxxx> > To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 1:42 PM > Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Purple-Tinted Negs > > > > Belated & heartfelt thanks to all who took the > time to > > respond, it took me a bit to bounce back after all > the > > holiday weekend schlepping! > > > > From her comments, I think my friend is using both > TMax > > and Tri-X. I think after all of everyone's help > she > > shouldn't have the problem again! > > > > As is often the case in life as well as > photography, an > > answer begets another question in reference to > this > > excerpt: > > > > The old rule of thumb still holds, measure the > clearing > > time and fix for double this time. The old rule is > also > > that > > the fixer should be discarded when clearing time > doubles. > > This might be OK for a two bath system but IMO is > well > > beyond the safe limit for a single bath. > > > > --- > > Richard Knoppow > > Los Angeles, CA, USA > > dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > How does one know when the clearing time should be > > > increased? > > > > Thanks, > > Adrienne Moumin > > By fixing out a scrap of film occasionally. Use a > scrap > of the film you originally tested with. Soak it in > plain > water for 2 or 3 minutes (longer is OK) and then fix > it and > watch to see when the cloudiness disappears. The > reason for > soaking in water is that the rate of fixing for wet > film is > different from dry film. Since the film is wet in > practice > it should be wet when testing. > > Its important to understand that clearing is not > the same > as fixing. The film can be visually clear and still > have > enough halide left in it to cause trouble later. > However, > the time it takes to clear is a good indication of > the > amount of silver dissolved in the hypo. > > Another test is to use a solution of Potassium > Iodide. > When this is added to fixer it combines with the > silver to > form Silver Iodide in the form of a cream colored > cloud. The > amount of dissolved silver which results in a cloud > which is > not immedediately dissipated depends on the dilution > of the > test solution. Kodak gives instructions for testing > both > single and double baths but I think there is an > error in the > instructions for the two bath system. I have not > been able > to substantiate this. In any case, its easy to see > when film > clears and its a more direct test. > > The degree of fixing can also be tested using a > solution > of either Sodium sulfide or Kodak Rapid Selenium > Toner, > diluted 1:9. The Sulfide test is standard. KRST > can be > used provided the film or paper is well washed > because it > fails if there is a lot of residual hypo. > A drop or two of the test solution is placed on a > clear > area of the film or paper and allowed to stand for > about 2 > minutes. It is then rinsed off. There should be no > residual > stain. Both Sulfide and Selenium will "tone" silver > halide > or incomplete fixer reaction products as readily as > metallic > silver so any stain will indicate the presence of > silver in > some form. Since this method tests the actual > performance of > the fixer it is probably the best test. When this > test is > used on paper I suggest using a scrap that has been > processed along with the prints. The reason is that > prints > or film that has been tested should be washed > following the > test, which is, of course, not necessary when a > scrap is > used. Also, the stain, if it develops, is permanent. > The > film or paper can be re-fixed in fresh fixer but > refixing > will not remove the stain. > This residual silver test should be run on a > routine > basis where permanence is of concern. Also, it will > show up > prints that will give problems when toned ahead of > time. > > --- > Richard Knoppow > Los Angeles, CA, USA > dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > ============================================================================================================= > To unsubscribe from this list, go to > www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the > same e-mail address and password you set-up when you > subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there. > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ============================================================================================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.