[pure-silver] Re: Pure Silver Print Exchange
- From: Marvin <marvbej@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 08:26:43 -0400
Welcome Chuck/Speedy--you make number 11 (one other Pure-Silver List member
contacted me off list yesterday). I think we'll have to cut it off with you as
the last person to join this round. The consensus is that 10 is the optimum
number, but we've occasionally, as in this round, had more. I'll contact you
off list with more information.
Bob Marvin
On Sep 26, 2012, at 1:10 AM, Speedy <speedgraphic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Speedy <speedgraphic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Pure Silver Print Exchange
> Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 13:26:13 +0000
>
> Bob,
>
> If you you still have a spot i would like to be included in the exchange
>
> Chuck Ulm
> AKA Speedy
>
>> Subject: [pure-silver] Pure Silver Print Exchange
>> From: marvbej@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 08:51:16 -0400
>> To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>> I've been helping to revive the "Pure Silver Print Exchange" which was
>> originally organized among readers of this list. As the name suggests,
>> members send each other prints (naturally B&W silver gelatin). An optimum
>> number of members seems to be 10. So far we have 9 "old timers" signed up.
>> The deadline for the next exchange will be Nov. 15th. Members get a mailing
>> list of all the participants and send them each a print, typically any size
>> up to 11 X 14 (which, I think, is the largest size that can be economically
>> mailed). I've accumulated many wonderful prints over the several exchanges
>> in which I've participated and find the exchanges very rewarding
>> Are you interested? If so, reply to this list or, if you prefer, contact me
>> off list at "bmarvin [at] plgarts [dot] org".
>>
>> Bob Marvin
>
Other related posts:
