Tim That should be proportional too, due to the normal viewing distance increase, but you have a point, since we can¹t keep those folks at that distance:) Never thought of that. Thanks. Regards Ralph W. Lambrecht http://www.darkroomagic.com On 2006-09-10 11:19, "Tim Rudman" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Yes, thanks Ralph, I am sure you are right, but the grain will be much more > visible on a much enlarged print and if the grain is fuzzy on one side but is > sharp on the other, it will be more apparent than it would be on a small > print. That's what I meant. Should have been a bit more explicit. > > Tim > http://www.worldoflithprinting.com > > > > From: pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ralph W. Lambrecht > Sent: 10 September 2006 00:49 > To: PureSilverNew > Subject: [pure-silver] Re: [Norton AntiSpam] Making Mega Prints > > Tim > > I didn¹t check my math yet, but I thought the error through misalignment is > proportional? > > > > > > Regards > > > > Ralph W. Lambrecht > > http://www.darkroomagic.com > > > > > > > > On 2006-09-09 13:10, "Tim Rudman" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Another consideration Justine, if you are going to wall mount: You will need >> to take great care with really accurate alignment. The greater the >> enlargement, the more obvious will be any misalignment - unsharp grain on one >> side etc >> >> Tim >> http://www.worldoflithprinting.com <http://www.worldoflithprinting.com/> >> >> >> >> From: pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> [mailto:pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Justin F. Knotzke >> Sent: 08 September 2006 20:46 >> To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: [pure-silver] Re: [Norton AntiSpam] Making Mega Prints >> >> On 9/8/06, Nick Zentena <zentena@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> You can do the math but a new wide angle enlarger lens would cost more >>> then >>> a new enlarger-(. >> >> I majored in Philsophy. This gives you an idea of my math abilities.. >> >> Having said that.. where can I go to get more info on the calculations >> required.. >> >> Thanks >> >> J >> > >