I should have added in my discussion of Mortensen and brilliance and pivoting somewhere besides highlights - I'm not a people photographer. Yes, I think the highlight side of the face would probably turn out to be my area of most interest. And I can only imagine the result of flat lighting and expanding midtones. Regards... Dick Gifford DarkroomMagic wrote: > I just can't imagine a high-key image in which highlights are less important > than midtones. > > Even with portraits, I would still prefer an image with good highlights > (probably the most lit side of the face), good open shadows and letting the > medium skin tones fall in between, over one where the medium skin tones are > theoretically perfect or 100% realistic, but the highlights are blown out or > the shadows are dead. > > The only exception to 'expose for the highlights and control the shadows > with contrast', I can think of, are low-key images. > > > > > > Regards > > > > Ralph W. Lambrecht > > > > > On 12/16/04 8:08 AM, "Ryuji Suzuki" <rs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >>Highlights are much less important than midtones in many types of >>images, including but not limited to portraits. Others are >>commercial/product photos and many high key images like scenes in >>heavy fog. > > > ============================================================================================================= > To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your > account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you > subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there. > ============================================================================================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.