As we farang say here, T.I.T. This is Thailand. :) e On Jul 26, 2013, at 5:32 PM, Laurence Cuffe <cuffe@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Its worth being aware that different jurisdictions have different rules in > relation to this. It may be perfectly legal for some-one to put a copy of a > book or document online in their own country, but still be illegal for you to > view or download it in yours. > My 2c on that issue. > > On the substantive issue of composition, I think analyzing the composition of > images with a view to discerning some profound overarching, underlying deep > structure has much in common with fortune telling. That is many very general > statements appear to be giving much more specific advice than they in fact > do. If you look at some general purpose web archive like flickr you can > apply rules of composition to a large collection of images, and see if the > rules are effective at separating the strong from the weak images. > > having said that Mortenson is still interesting to read, as is John Alton's > "painting with light", also available online but definitly not legal for US > citizens to download or view, hence no link from me. > All the best > > Laurence Cuffe. > > > > > > >> >> >> On 26 July 2013 12:46, <carlileb@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> 95 years if the copyright was renewed. But if a book was published before >> 1964 and the copyright was not renewed, it only remained in copyright for 26 >> years. >> >> I suspect this book wasn't renewed. >> >> Mortensen for some reason is huge right now. Even his International >> Photography magazine plates are getting bucks. I think he did a lot of junk, >> personally. But his fights with Ansel Adams in Camera Craft are fun to read. >> >> >>