> So IOW the density reading from a pyro negative may not be an=20 > accurate=20 > guide to the required contrast filtration if you're using VC=20 > paper - which=20 > is fair enough. As the instrument measures a wide colour=20 > spectrum it will=20 > presumably read both the silver and stain densities and give you an=20 > effective total. I am doing some testing with Pyrocat HD (TMX and TMY), including measuring densities with a Macbeth TD 504. The problem of properly stained negs: the higher the silver density, the higher the stain effect. I tried using the "blue"-channel of my densitometer as an approximation to the UV-densities and compared the results with the silver densities measured via the visual channel. There is no constant factor like: "add 0,4 and its done".=20 The Pyrocat stain has its highest effectiveness in the UV-Range which is AFAIK important for alternative processing. But for variable contrast printing I would guess the UV-part does not play such an important role. If I standardize my development for the G-bar-values obtained via the blue channel densities, I have to use grade 3,5 for printing. So in the future I will work with visual densities, this seems to correspond better with my printing technique. Michael ============================================================================================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.