At 06:07 PM 4/1/2008, you wrote:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 8:52 PM, Richard Knoppow <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:> > > > > I am a bit puzzled about which edition this is. 1963 is a bit > late for the "Revised" edition (not called the second edition in the > book), which I believe was published about 1951. This sounds more > like the 3rd edition by Mees and James. Mees retired about 1960 or 61 > and died shortly thereafter. The third and forth editions are larger > in format than the original and revised editions. > There is a difference in the style of the earlier and later > editions. While each section of the earlier ones was written by a > specialist the book has a greater sense of unity than the later ones. > The science of photographic chemistry was changing very quickly > at the time the third and forth editions were written and this may > have something to do with it. > I find the earlier editions valuable because they have good > sections on sensitometery and tone rendition in them.
That's the good one. I didn't realize they continued to print it that late. There some differences from the first edition because of discoveries made in the interim and the first also has a section on photographic sound recording which was dropped.
-- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles, CA, USAdickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
============================================================================================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.