I agree with John. In my opinion extending the list of parameters in email-settings is the only way to avoid problems with different ports, encrypting- and access-methods in the future. 73, Franz, oe5rtl Am 2014-08-31 um 15:37 schrieb John Douyere: > I can see some issues in the future with different access methods, > different ports, etc. > > Since these are pop servers specific parameters, asking the Pskmail server > to resolve which parameters to use by itself is not right imo. > > Shouldn't we add these parameters to the user's record as if we were > configuring an email client on a local machine? > > 73, John > On Aug 31, 2014 9:00 PM, "Rein Couperus" <rein@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> All, >> >> I have been checking the code of Mail::POP3Client, and it shows that port >> 995 is indeed used for SSL. Problem is that I have only allowed SSL for >> gmail and web.de >> at the moment. Until now we did not get complaints ;-) >> Obvious solution is to enable SSL for mail download by default, >> I think the majority of the mail servers is now on SSL. >> Any arguments against? If not, I will change the server accordingling >> (SSL by default). >> >> Rein PA0R >> >> >> https://hilfe.gmx.net/mailprogramme/pop3.html >> >> Maybe they require first POP then SMTP??? >> >> >> Am 31.08.2014 12:34, schrieb Rein Couperus: >> >> Hi Marcel, >> >> SSL (TLS) is supported by the servers, it uses port 587 for gmail. >> Have not tried gmx.de (I use web.de, and there port 587 is supported for >> TLS). >> Is 995 the only SSL port supported by gmx.de ? >> >> Rein PA0R >> >> Hi, >> >> I managed today to get a connection to SM0RWO-1 and updated server data >> and session password. >> But although the data is correct I get the message "wrong email data"... >> May it's because GMX only provides SSL? Is this supported (Port 995)? >> >> BR >> Marcel >> >> >> >> >