[projectaon] Re: Last of the 20tcon errata
- From: Jonathan Blake <jonathan.blake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: projectaon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 16:09:17 -0800
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Ingo Kloecker
<projectaon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I think I'm with Ben. The point is not whether the green color is eerie
> or whether the light is eerie. In my opinion it's the "green light"
> that's eerie. Take for example the typical white light glaring out of
> the woods through the trees (-> a UFO ;-) ). It's neither the color
> white that's eerie nor the light that's eerie. It's the combination,
> i.e. the harsh white light, that's eerie.
Are you suggesting that to make this unambiguous (a difficult
standard, of course) we change it to "eerie green-light"? ;)
--
Jon
~~~~~~
Manage your subscription at //www.freelists.org/list/projectaon
Other related posts:
