On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Simon Osborne <outspaced@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> (er) 260: quiver -> Quiver(s) [It is possible to carry multiple >>> Quivers cf. Book 8 Section 168] >> >> fixed already? > > No; it has been fixed to "Quiver", but should it be further altered to > "Quiver(s)"? Ah! I don't know if I like the idea of correcting this every time a Quiver is mentioned. A footnote in the rules (or even just a mention in the Rules Handbook) should be enough. Agreed? >> That's the end of the errata (at least as of the time when I gathered >> them). Now if I can get some time to finish the illustration >> transcription. > > But there's more! :-) > > (er) 105: eerie green light -> eerie, green light agreed > (er) 200: psychic disciplines -> psychic abilities [so: To avoid a > capitalised "Disciplines" which seems somewhat out of place] agreed > (er) 251: eerie yellow luminescence -> eerie, yellow luminescence agreed > What's (known and) left to look at (a plea for help!): > > (ft) 260: [It is possible to carry multiple Quivers cf. Book 8 Section 168] > [Wording?] See above. > (ft) 330: [James Chown: When deleting items in the last three spaces of the > backpack, what happens if nothing is there? According to the wording, if > nothing is there - nothing gets erased. But was the meaning obscured with > the last three backpack items removed?] [Answer? Wording?] I know we've footnoted something like this before. Does anyone happen to remember where? -- Jon ~~~~~~ Manage your subscription at //www.freelists.org/list/projectaon