On 30/11/2009 09:48, pamail.cgi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
The following was sent from the Editor's Companion form
From: Jan Charvát<ch.honza@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 09:48:15 on Monday, November 30, 2009
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
(ft) 15tdc 25: [jc: It is possible that you have taken part in the Battle of
Cetza without meeting Captain Prarg. (The same problem is probably also in the
Deathlord of Ixia, section 22.)]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Hi JanI wish these things were more straightforward! I prefer to place the footnotes in Section 315 (Book 15) and Section 305 (Book 17).
Book 15: "It is possible that you took part in the Battle of Cetza without meeting Captain Prarg. This continuity error cannot be reconciled."
Book 17: "It is possible that you took part in the Battle of Cetza without meeting Captain Prarg (though you will certainly have met him if you have played The Darke Crusade). This continuity error cannot be reconciled."
If no one has any complaints about the wording, I'll get these into the test area tonight or tomorrow morning. Phew!
-- Simon Osborne Project Aon ~~~~~~ Manage your subscription at //www.freelists.org/list/projectaon
