[project1dev] Re: 1.92 million for 24 songs.
- From: eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 16:37:01 -0400
if i was a billionaire i'd pay it for her, big music companies are gonna DIE
www.adunai.com/sshnd/
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Chris Riccobono <crysalim@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Don't feel so bad. Something like this just brings more negative
> attention to them, and in the business world the riaa is already
> considered obsolete. This lawsuit is one of the many things that end
> up leaking thru because the courts are slow. They're already on the
> way out.
>
> Major bands have started making their own labels so they don't have to
> answer to the riaa, which has been ruining sales because they haven't
> adapted to online selling. I know that Metallica made their own, and
> Dream Theater is going to as well (although Roadrunner records isn't a
> bad label)
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Nick Klotz<roracsenshi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> http://www.insidetech.com/news/articles/5096-jury-fines-music-file-sharer-192m----for-only-24-songs
> > Something is seriously fucked up with this world.
>
>
Other related posts:
