[project1dev] Re: 1.92 million for 24 songs.
- From: Chris Riccobono <crysalim@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 13:20:23 -0700
Don't feel so bad. Something like this just brings more negative
attention to them, and in the business world the riaa is already
considered obsolete. This lawsuit is one of the many things that end
up leaking thru because the courts are slow. They're already on the
way out.
Major bands have started making their own labels so they don't have to
answer to the riaa, which has been ruining sales because they haven't
adapted to online selling. I know that Metallica made their own, and
Dream Theater is going to as well (although Roadrunner records isn't a
bad label)
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Nick Klotz<roracsenshi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> http://www.insidetech.com/news/articles/5096-jury-fines-music-file-sharer-192m----for-only-24-songs
> Something is seriously fucked up with this world.
Other related posts:
