Yours and mine to, I guess ... unless there are really walking cars :p. In fact, most part of folks that were argumenting from our point of view seen to live in non english contries. Marlon 2007/12/3, Octavian Rasnita <orasnita@xxxxxxxxx>: > Yeah it seems that many of us agree now, and in fact one of the problems of > this discussion was my english which is not good enough to express all what > I think. > :-) > > > Octavian > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Marlon Brandão de Sousa" <splyt.lists@xxxxxxxxx> > To: <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 2:18 PM > Subject: Re: Competitiveness of blind web developers > > > > OGood ... I sent five, six messages to that big thread trying to say > > what Jamal just wrote here. It seen that the only problem was a kind > > of comunication failed flow on that giant thing... > > If some of you remember the first message I sent, it was the fifth or > > sixth message, I said that a blind would never be able to compet with > > sighted on pure visual aspects of the whole thing, and for me a web > > designer is one worried with nothing but the pure visual stuff. I said > > clearly a blind would be more productive working in the back end, > > doing the logic buseness, since sight isn't needed to do this and > > components can be tested, planned, well developed, while a sighted > > designer can draw, plan interfaces, test, have insights and new ideas, > > in the visual area. > > Thanks Jamal for writing what most part of us were trying to say. I > > think blinds, in the vast majority of cases, can act as web > > developpers without problems, but they can't act as webdesigners. > > As for your google sample, Jamal, the main problem is that many > > companies are still living in the stone age, and htat's the reazon why > > google is taking so many leadership in several areas of services ... > > to most part of companies a good site still is one full of animations > > and colors, they still trust more on an apealing interface than in > > usability ... so emploiment, as seen by this perspective, would be a > > problem because few companies are more worried with usability, and a > > blind designer would succeed only in sites made with this in mind, so > > only a few companies would employ a blind web designer (note that I am > > talking about a blind web designer, not about a blind web developper). > > Another [problem is that, in some countries, one working with web > > stuff is expected to be a developper and a designer. People still > > didn't realise that an artist would be better with graphics than a > > developer, so they aquire one guy and want he / she does the logic > > and the interface, and if you talk these guys that a blind could only > > do the logical stuff they won't accept him because he can't do the > > interface. > > This is changing, but it is doing that a little slow ... but, as > > separation between web designer and web developper is becoming more > > used, blinds can meet more jobs in the web developement area. > > Marlon > > 2007/12/1, Jamal Mazrui <empower@xxxxxxxxx>: > >> Given Octavian's prior experience as a sighted web designer, I take him > >> at > >> his word that he cannot do things he used to be able to do, and empathize > >> with his implicit frustration at not being able to compete favorably with > >> sighted web designers in every possible way.. With that said, however, I > >> think it is flawed reasoning to think that we compete against people who > >> have all of the same skills except for the addition of sight. As others > >> here have said, we compete with a combination of strenghts and > >> weaknesses, > >> one of the latter being the lack of sight -- for both its physical and > >> prejudicial consequences. I submit that the combination of Octavian's > >> skills, by his own description, make him competitive as a web developer > >> in > >> his country. I did say web developer rather than web designer, because I > >> infer that the latter refers to highly visual aspects of web development. > >> It is understandable that a blind person would be at a serious > >> disadvantage in primarily visuall-oriented artistic expression. I do > >> not think blind people can compete in painting, for example. > >> > >> To me, a more important question than the competitiveness of web design, > >> thus, is the competitiveness of web development for blind people. I > >> think > >> Octavian is right that a lot of web sites emphasize "sexy" visual appeal, > >> for which blind people cannot realistically compete in development. > >> However, I do not agree that such web sites are the primary means of web > >> site competitiveness. Google -- the most popular web site in the > >> world -- > >> has succeeded partly because of the usability of its design, which is not > >> visually sexy, but highly usable. Many other sites would similarly > >> benefit from principles that emphasize productivity rather than > >> entertainment of the user, and users would reward such sites with their > >> visitation and purchases. > >> > >> Thus, I think it is more meaningful to conceive of us competing as web > >> developers rather than web designers. We cannot provide all the glitzy > >> subtleties that the best sighted designers can do, but we can master > >> principles of web site usability (including accessibility) that make the > >> sites we develop both productive and pleasing to visit. > >> > >> These things said, I do think that we have to be extra good at nonvisual > >> aspects of a profession in order to compete -- again, because of both > >> physical and prejudicial adversities. We must, for example, know HTML, > >> CSS, and principles of visual asthetics, mouse, and keyboard usability > >> better than average in order to compensate for the disadvantages that we > >> will fase as a result of blindness. Doing so is within the realm of > >> possibility -- not just for the exceptions -- but it does require > >> additional dedication to the field. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Jamal > >> __________ > >> View the list's information and change your settings at > >> //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > When you say "I wrote a program that crashed Windows," people just > > stare at you blankly and say "Hey, I got those with the system, for > > free." > > Linus Torvalds > > __________ > > View the list's information and change your settings at > > //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind > > > > __________ > View the list's information and change your settings at > //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind > > -- When you say "I wrote a program that crashed Windows," people just stare at you blankly and say "Hey, I got those with the system, for free." Linus Torvalds __________ View the list's information and change your settings at //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind