RE: Accessible continuous integration software.
- From: "Sina Bahram" <sbahram@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 12:12:44 -0400
Me too. Most friends use Hudson. It's extremely powerful.
Take care,
Sina
________________________________
From: programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Andreas Stefik
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 10:22 AM
To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Accessible continuous integration software.
Nick,
Most folks I know use Hudson, but I haven't tried it myself. Have you tried
that?
Stefik
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 2:44 AM, <Nick.Adamson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi All.
Excuse the cross posting and I don't remember if I've asked this in the
past.
I'm the administrator for our CI system which monitors our source code
repository and performs a build when code is checked
in. The one we use now is accessible but rubbish at everything else.
Has any one got any experiences good or bad of CI software from an
accessibility point of view.
Thanks for any thoughts.
Nick.
Nick Adamson
Software Engineer
Advanced Projects and Technology
General Dynamics United Kingdom Limited
Bryn Brithdir, Oakdale Business Park, Blackwood, South Wales, NP12 4AA
Telephone: +44 (0)1495 23 6467
Email: Nick.Adamson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Website: www.generaldynamics.uk.com
<http://www.generaldynamics.uk.com/>
To help reduce waste paper, please only print this email if you really
need to.
__________
View the list's information and change your settings at
//www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind
Other related posts:
