I think it’s a good idea to have the most suggested at the top of the list, and
if possible the suggested items further down in the list in the usual
alphabetical order so there’s the options of both. I don’t think any audible
recognition of whether the item is suggested is really necessary as, if the
focus was placed at the top of the list as it should be, The user would realise
that the first few items are out of order. As they arrow further down in the
list they will realise that the items they are going through will change to be
in alphabetical order. So basically, the fact that the suggestions are at the
top of the list are not in alphabetical order will highlight the fact that they
are suggestions if you know what I mean?
Luke
On 5 Nov 2018, at 20:38, Drenth, Joe <Joe.Drenth@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Dante,
Having the most commonly used members first would be very helpful. Can it be
based on the current programmer's most frequent use of members, or would it
be based on an analysis of all users? There are pros and cons to each option,
I am sure.
Regarding putting the most common ones first versus keeping the entire list
in alphabetical order, one idea is that when the user types the period ("."),
the list box could be set to the most common member (in its normal
alphabetical order) and a modifier could be used to jump between the most
common members, such as holding CTRL with down or up arrows to jump to the
next most common item lower or higher in the list. This way, no "star" or
anything else would have to be added to the list box entry -- The user is
simply placed on the most common method and CTRL+UP and CTRL+DOWN jump to the
other most common items, while regular DOWN and UP step through all available
items.
Thanks,
Joe
Joseph Drenth
Senior R&D Software Engineer
JBT Corporation | Automated Systems
400 Highpoint Drive
Chalfont, PA 18914, USA
E: joe.drenth@xxxxxxxx P: 215 822 4457
www.jbtc-agv.com
-----Original Message-----
From: program-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:program-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] ;
On Behalf Of Dante Gagne
Sent: Monday, November 5, 2018 2:48 PM
To: program-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [program-l] Opinion on Visual Studio code completion experience
**This email is from an external sender**
Hey folks,
First off, if folks think this is an inappropriate use of the list, just say
so and I'll take it offlist and apologize up front. However, I was hoping I
could ask the crowd for a few opinions now and then for functionality that
we're considering in the upcoming version(s) of Visual Studio. Essentially, I
have my guesses that this experience would work, but I'd rather YOU folks
tell me that it does.
Today when you're coding in Visual Studio, when you hit "." After a token,
the Intellisense completion list comes up with every single possible token
that could follow. So, if you type "Debug.", you'll get "Assert, AutoFlush,
Close,..." etc... (To be clear, you get a list box with each of these as an
entry in it, so you'd hit arrow key to travel through).
The new feature, uses machine learning to "guess" what is most commonly used.
For instance, for most folks, Debug.Write or Debug.WriteLine is the most
common completion. The feature will move those items to the top of the list.
However, since they're out of alphabetical order, they are annotated to show
that these are "recommended" instead of in the "everything" list.
If we did nothing, when you type Debug. You would hear "Write, Writeline,
Assert, Autoflush", etc... But in that case, you don't know which ones are
recommended, just that they're the first ones.
The question I have is this... how would you feel if the recommended
completions were preceded with the word "Star"? So, if I went this way, you'd
type "Debug" and hear "Star Write, Star Writeline, Assert, Autoflush...". The
first suggestion that was made was to say "Recommended", but that's four
syllables and I asserted that a screen reader user would go crazy having to
sit through hearing "Recommended Recommended Recommended..." over and over.
But "Star" is very quick.
We had also thought about putting it after the token so you'd here "Write
Star, Writeline Star, Assert, Autoflush" but the thought there was that
"Write Star" sounds an awful lot like the name of the method is literally
"WriteStar".
How do folks feel about this? Is "Star" short enough that saying it before
the recommended items (of which there usually aren't more than 2-3)? Some
other suggestion?
Thanks in advance, and again, I do apologize if this is out of line for the
mailing list. Just let me know.
-Dante
** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:-
** [mailto:program-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe]
** If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
** program-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
** and in the Subject line type
** unsubscribe
** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the
** immediately-following link:-
** [mailto:program-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]
** or send a message, to
** program-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq
** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:-
** [mailto:program-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe]
** If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
** program-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
** and in the Subject line type
** unsubscribe
** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the
** immediately-following link:-
** [mailto:program-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]
** or send a message, to
** program-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq
