On May 1, 2012, at 6:10 PM, Craig Small wrote: > So, in short looking at these patches again, I think #1 is fine to go in > and #2 (unless someone is really quick and really bored to check) we'll > leave out. We'll just make sure #1 is lexicographically correct :) Craig, Please, it's already covered. This commit is all we need for now. commit 04ca0b1cbf978a7accb0404340e5355e33b2084a The user will get a message just like ps if /proc is not mounted. Jim