I don't know what that material is, Peter, but I have no doubt that the industry will develop an artificial or synthetic replacement well before 2017. We may not even need monitors. I saw a keyboard replacement at an exhibition. A picture of the keyboard is projected onto your working area or table, and you can type on it directly. Similarly, the previews that I saw of Windows 7 show an onscreen touch keyboard that can replace the regular keyboard (although it must be very difficult to get any speed typing vertically!) Similarly, the industry can find a replacement for screens - either by projecting them onto the wall or a table or a working area. I don't think we should worry about the planet running out of materials to build LCDs. David Grossman > So crt's are being made less and less as lcd and plasma monitors gain > popularity so lesser need for shielding. As an aside, lcd's must evolve > as well as one important material in their construction will be > exhausted by 2017. > > A fellow student from a while back worked on concert stage construction > and shielded each and every speaker magnet with a sheet steel box. Must > have been a lot of boxes. > > Peter Kaulback > > Clint Hamilton-PCWorks Admin wrote: > >> By the way, I don't know whether Energy Star > >> has to do with radiation. It has to do with > >> electricity consumption. > > > > Yes, I'm not sure it does: "In the USA, all monitors now are > > 'Energy Star' compliant which also ***might*** reduce > > radiation". I guess if you make them more efficient that > > **might possibly** reduce some of the radiation. > > > > Again, I'm mostly talking about **magnetic** fields. A CRT > > doesn't really have enough to damage a flash drive or SS HD, > > unless perhaps it's resting on top for a period of time. > > Shielding of harmful magnetic fields would have to be > > retroactive which is not possible (you can't go and shield > > every speaker or device with a large magnet in it that's > > already been purchased), so the SSD's would have to be > > manufactured with some kind of far different "shielding" than a > > monitor due to the much stronger gauss of said devices. I > > guess that would have to be some kind of "cancellation magnet" > > around them sort of like shielded speakers have......but, I've > > never tried that to see how that would work. The cancellation > > device might have to be only around the magnet itself that's > > causing the field. > > > > I've built speakers before for monitor or TV use with drivers > > that were not shielded, and I was able to shield them using > > some kind of metal. I'm not sure what it was, it was NOT > > magnetic, at least it was not drawn to magnets. It looked like > > it had zinc in it. > > -Clint > > > > God Bless > > Clint Hamilton, Owner > > http://www.OrpheusComputing.com > > http://www.ComputersCustomBuilt.com > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "David Grossman" > > > > > > Right, Clint. > > That's exactly what the computer industry did with monitors. > > They shielded > > them well enough to meet the standards. > > The problem with solid state drives is different, but if they > > can solve the > > radiation problem with monitors, they can do a comparable trick > > with drives. > > By the way, I don't know whether Energy Star has to do with > > radiation. It > > has to do with electricity consumption. Radiation standards are > > based on > > TCO. > > David Grossman > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > > >> I agree, but they still ARE a problem. I was mostly talking > >> about magnets more than stray EM fields from electronic > >> devices, and the only way to fix that is to make products > >> shielded from them, or make products that's not sensitive to > >> them. In the USA, all monitors now are "Energy Star" > >> compliant > >> which also might reduce radiation. http://tinyurl.com/6ptk9a > >> -Clint > > > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "David Grossman" > >> > >> Electromagnetic fields do not have to be a problem. > >> > >> About 20 or 25 years ago, CRTs emitted a great deal of > >> radiation, causing > >> pregnant mommies who were exposed to the radiation for many > >> hours a day to > >> spontaneously abort their babies. The fledgling computer > >> giants > >> were > >> terrified that a wonderful industry with a great future would > >> go belly up > >> (perhaps I should have used a better expression!) and they > >> were > >> determined > >> to find a solution. They did - and the resulting and > >> ever-increasing > >> Scandinavian TCO standards are so stringent today that there > >> is > >> nothing to > >> worry about. Granted, flat screens largely replaced CRTs > >> today, > >> but that's > >> not the point - and even flat screens have to comply with TCO > >> standards. > >> > >> The industry reacted and solved the problem with one kind of > >> radiation > >> because they had no choice. They proved that with > >> determination > >> it is > >> possible to practically eliminate the threat of dangerous > >> radiation. > >> > >> When it comes down to it, electromagnetic fields are just > >> another kind of > >> radiation. The industry solved the problem with CRTs, and > >> they > >> CAN solve the > >> problem with solid state media. > >> > >> It's just an issue of determination and will-power. > >> > >> David Grossman > >> > >> > >> > No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.549 / Virus Database: 270.9.0/1775 - Release Date: 11/8/2008 9:56 AM ========================= The list's FAQ's can be seen by sending an email to PCWorks-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with FAQ in the subject line. To unsubscribe, subscribe, set Digest or Vacation to on or off, go to //www.freelists.org/list/pcworks . You can also send an email to PCWorks-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with Unsubscribe in the subject line. Your member list settings can be found at //www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi/l=pcworks . Once logged in, you have access to numerous other email options. The list archives are located at //www.freelists.org/archives/pcworks/ . All email posted to the list will be placed there in the event anyone needs to look for previous posts. -zxdjhu-