I'm with Don, but even more so. I truly don't see the value or the need for 'shorter links'. I've never found wrapped links to be a problem and, as Don said, when you click on a 'shorter link', you have no idea where you're going. It's kinda' like html in email; it's cute but it's also dangerous, and totally unnecessary. Also, there's this, from Bob -- the "Keyboard Cowboy", ">>As an example, lets look at the link: >> >>http://www.audiogalaxy.com/satellite/index.php?SID=89eb207ee536f0f730e >>f195239bf6421 >> >>Using TinyURL, it becomes: >> >>http://tinyurl.com/5ccty >> >>The only problem with this is there is no way to recognize what the >>link is later. To solve this, you can give the link a name - any >>name >>you want. To accomplish this, place a space, question mark, and >>another space between the URL and the description. As an example, a >>URL would look like -- URL ? NAME-of-URL. Using the TinyURL from >>this post, it would look like this: >> >>http://tinyurl.com/5ccty ? Audiogalaxy's peer-to-peer network " This is way too much to go through. If I want to post a link, I'll post the link. The above takes a perfectly good link, easily identifiable, makes it obscure, and then identifies it again. Back and forth, back and forth. No thank you, I'll just post the link. Tom donelias@xxxxxxxx wrote: > The thing I don't like about using tunyurl (or one of the > similar services) is that there is no way to determine > what the actual site is. I usually want to know what > the site is because I might recognize it as one I have > accessed before and had problems with the site or > maybe it is one I have already thoroughly browsed. > > I can very easily reconstruct broken links - or I may > not even have to if I recognize them. I reconstruct them > by copying and pasting into (usually) Notepad. > > The ideal solution, in my opinion, would be to provide > both: the full URL (even if broken) and the shorthand > version. The description noted, if provided, may or may > not be meaningful to other users. > > Maybe for you folks that have high speed on-all-the-time > connections can use that to find the actual site from the > tinyurl notation but I would have to fire up my dial up > connection to do so. > > Don > > On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 11:57:57 -0500 The Keyboard Cowboy > <KBCowboy@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >>Just a little tip.......... >>Hey guys.....just for those who don't know it already, for those long >>links that invariably cause trouble with wraps, etc., you ought to go >>to: >> >>http://tinyurl.com/ >> >>As an example, lets look at the link: >> >>http://www.audiogalaxy.com/satellite/index.php?SID=89eb207ee536f0f730e >>f195239bf6421 >> >>Using TinyURL, it becomes: >> >>http://tinyurl.com/5ccty >> >>The only problem with this is there is no way to recognize what the >>link is later. To solve this, you can give the link a name - any >>name >>you want. To accomplish this, place a space, question mark, and >>another space between the URL and the description. As an example, a >>URL would look like -- URL ? NAME-of-URL. Using the TinyURL from >>this post, it would look like this: >> >>http://tinyurl.com/5ccty ? Audiogalaxy's peer-to-peer network >> >> Regards from >> >>Bob -- the "Keyboard Cowboy", -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.7.2 - Release Date: 3/11/2005 -- <Please delete this line and everything below.> To unsub or change your email settings: //www.freelists.org/webpage/pctechtalk To access our Archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PCTechTalk/messages/ //www.freelists.org/archives/pctechtalk/ For more info: //www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/list?list_id=pctechtalk