Firefox sux; -way too many *&%^^ software killing updates! Does Chrome work any better? -Also, anyone use Crazy Browser? Greywoulf On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 1:06 AM, FreeLists Mailing List Manager < ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > ---------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe or change your email settings: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/pctechtalk > > To access our Archives: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PCTechTalk/messages/ > //www.freelists.org/archives/pctechtalk/ > > To contact only the PCTT Mod Squad, write to: > pctechtalk-moderators@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > ---------------------------------------------- > ------------------------------------ > pctechtalk Digest Sun, 13 Jan 2013 Volume: 11 Issue: 010 > > In This Issue: > -=PCTechTalk=- I E 8 is getting old > -=PCTechTalk=- Re: I E 8 is getting old > -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Firefox 18 (and Google) updates suck big > -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Firefox 18 (and Google) updates suck big > -=PCTechTalk=- Re: I E 8 is getting old > -=PCTechTalk=- PSA: Java Exploit (Threat-level critical) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > From: HandsomeBlck@xxxxxxx > Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 09:27:24 -0500 (EST) > Subject: -=PCTechTalk=- I E 8 is getting old > > Hello all, > I'm starting to get notice from web sites saying my browser is too old. > What do you guys think a good upgrade would be for me? Running XP Home. > Thanks, > > HB > > > ------------------------------ > > From: "RecklessMaverick" <recklessmaverick@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: -=PCTechTalk=- Re: I E 8 is getting old > Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 11:44:57 -0500 > > I'm getting the same thing and I use IE 8. If MS ever restores control of > the toolbars to what it was in IE8, then and ONLY then will I upgrade. I > will NOT upgrade to 9 nor will I use Firefox. If a website decides they > don't like IE 8 then they decide they don't like me. I avoid websites that > don't like me. > > I may try Chrome, but like Firefox they do updates more often than most men > change their underwear. If they built a good quality product to begin with > they would not need to update their product so much and all the add-ons and > extensions would not need to be constantly updated. > > -----Original Message----- > From: pctechtalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:pctechtalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of HandsomeBlck@xxxxxxx > Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2013 9:27 AM > To: pctechtalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: -=PCTechTalk=- I E 8 is getting old > > Hello all, > I'm starting to get notice from web sites saying my browser is too old. > What do you guys think a good upgrade would be for me? Running XP Home. > Thanks, > > HB > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > Please remember to trim your replies (including this sentence and > everything > below it) and adjust the subject line as necessary. > > To subscribe, unsubscribe or modify your email settings: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/pctechtalk > OR > To subscribe to the mailing list, send an email to > pctechtalk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "subscribe" in the Subject. To > unsubscribe send email to pctechtalk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with > "unsubscribe" in the Subject. > > To access our Archives: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PCTechTalk/messages/ > //www.freelists.org/archives/pctechtalk/ > > To contact only the PCTT Mod Squad, write to: > pctechtalk-moderators@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > To join our separate PCTableTalk off-topic group, send a blank email to: > pctabletalk+subscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 14:47:35 -0500 > Subject: -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Firefox 18 (and Google) updates suck big time! > From: Skip <chazzlee@xxxxxxxxx> > > Yep! Totally agree! > And the other pest is Google..! Every time I open it up it seems they feel > they have an obligation to remind me that I'm not using the "latest" > browser and perhaps I should switch to Google Chrome! > I mean, who in hell gave these guys (Firefox and Google) the right to keep > insisting on *our* PCs that we update to their latest (often inferior) > product release? -Do they really think we are too stupid to know what we > want on our own computers??? > An informative single, one time pop-up stating a new release is available > *if > we wanted it *should be more than enough... There should be some kind of > law against these annoying attempts by software companies to try and force > people to use their products! > Also, if anyone on this list has any knowledge of how to change settings > and things in a PC to prevent these constantly annoying "reminders"(?) to > update things, I'd appreciate it very much..! > Thanks, > Greywoulf > > > From: "cristy" <poppy0206@xxxxxxx> > > > Subject: -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Firefox 18 sux big time! > > Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2013 22:44:04 -0500 > > > > Hi Greywolf, > > > > FF keeps bugging me too for updates and I want it to stop. I've had > issues > > with their updates in the past too. > > > > Christy > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Skip" <chazzlee@xxxxxxxxx> > > To: <pctechtalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2013 10:11 PM > > Subject: -=PCTechTalk=- Firefox 18 sux big time! > > > > > > Firefox 18 sux! > > I innocently let FF update itself to ver 18, forgetting the troubles I've > > had with FF's so-called "improvements" before! > > Sure enough, all of a sudden my printer software would not print anything > > legible (if at all?) from the web. Mowever my own hard drive stored > files, > > they still printed fine! > > So I uninstalled FF 18 and went back to ver 3.6.17., and everything's > > normal again! > > I think I'm gonna forget about there updates from now on. -Is there a way > > to disable their pestering pop-ups re their 'update' nonsense? > > Thanks, > > Greywoulf > > > > ------------------------------ > > From: "RecklessMaverick" <recklessmaverick@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Firefox 18 (and Google) updates suck big time! > Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 14:58:32 -0500 > > You could try using an entry in your HOSTS file but that might also stop > other desirable data from getting through also. > > -----Original Message----- > From: pctechtalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:pctechtalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Skip > Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2013 2:48 PM > To: pctechtalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Firefox 18 (and Google) updates suck big time! > > Yep! Totally agree! > And the other pest is Google..! Every time I open it up it seems they feel > they have an obligation to remind me that I'm not using the "latest" > browser and perhaps I should switch to Google Chrome! > I mean, who in hell gave these guys (Firefox and Google) the right to keep > insisting on *our* PCs that we update to their latest (often inferior) > product release? -Do they really think we are too stupid to know what we > want on our own computers??? > An informative single, one time pop-up stating a new release is available > *if we wanted it *should be more than enough... There should be some kind > of > law against these annoying attempts by software companies to try and force > people to use their products! > Also, if anyone on this list has any knowledge of how to change settings > and > things in a PC to prevent these constantly annoying "reminders"(?) to > update > things, I'd appreciate it very much..! > Thanks, > Greywoulf > > > From: "cristy" <poppy0206@xxxxxxx> > > > Subject: -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Firefox 18 sux big time! > > Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2013 22:44:04 -0500 > > > > Hi Greywolf, > > > > FF keeps bugging me too for updates and I want it to stop. I've had > > issues with their updates in the past too. > > > > Christy > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Skip" <chazzlee@xxxxxxxxx> > > To: <pctechtalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2013 10:11 PM > > Subject: -=PCTechTalk=- Firefox 18 sux big time! > > > > > > Firefox 18 sux! > > I innocently let FF update itself to ver 18, forgetting the troubles > > I've had with FF's so-called "improvements" before! > > Sure enough, all of a sudden my printer software would not print > > anything legible (if at all?) from the web. Mowever my own hard drive > > stored files, they still printed fine! > > So I uninstalled FF 18 and went back to ver 3.6.17., and everything's > > normal again! > > I think I'm gonna forget about there updates from now on. -Is there a > > way to disable their pestering pop-ups re their 'update' nonsense? > > Thanks, > > Greywoulf > > > > ------------------------------ > > From: "rudy" <rudylopeznc@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: -=PCTechTalk=- Re: I E 8 is getting old > Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 15:00:49 -0500 > > I switched to Google Chrome from Firefox......not bad > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <HandsomeBlck@xxxxxxx> > To: <pctechtalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2013 9:27 AM > Subject: -=PCTechTalk=- I E 8 is getting old > > > > Hello all, > > I'm starting to get notice from web sites saying my browser is too old. > > What do you guys think a good upgrade would be for me? Running XP Home. > > Thanks, > > > > HB > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Please remember to trim your replies (including this sentence and > > everything below it) and adjust the subject line as necessary. > > > > To subscribe, unsubscribe or modify your email settings: > > //www.freelists.org/webpage/pctechtalk > > OR > > To subscribe to the mailing list, send an email to > > pctechtalk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "subscribe" in the Subject. To > > unsubscribe send email to pctechtalk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with > > "unsubscribe" in the Subject. > > > > To access our Archives: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PCTechTalk/messages/ > > //www.freelists.org/archives/pctechtalk/ > > > > To contact only the PCTT Mod Squad, write to: > > pctechtalk-moderators@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > To join our separate PCTableTalk off-topic group, send a blank email to: > > pctabletalk+subscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus > > signature database 7889 (20130113) __________ > > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > > > > http://www.eset.com > > > > > > > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus > signature database 7889 (20130113) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > > http://www.eset.com > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 16:28:25 -0800 (PST) > From: LARRY SOUTHERLAND <larrysoutherland@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: -=PCTechTalk=- PSA: Java Exploit (Threat-level critical) > > > http://krebsonsecurity.com/2013/01/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-java-exploit/ > ________________________________ > 12 > Jan 13 > What You Need to Know About the Java Exploit > 254tweetsTOP5Kretweet > On Thursday, the world learned that attackers were breaking into computers > using > a previously undocumented security hole in Java, a program that is > installed on > hundreds of millions of computers worldwide. This post aims to answer > some of > the most frequently asked questions about the vulnerability, and to > outline > simple steps that users can take to protect themselves. > Q: What is Java, anyway? > A: Java is a programming language and computing platform that powers > programs > including utilities, games, and business applications. According to Java > maker > Oracle Corp., Java runs on more than 850 million personal computers > worldwide, > and on billions of devices worldwide, including mobile and TV devices. It > is > required by some Web sites that use it to run interactive games and > applications. > Q: So what is all the fuss about? > A: Researchers have discovered that cybercrooks are attacking a previously > unknown security hole in Java 7 that can be used to seize control over a > computer if a user visits a compromised or malicious Web site. > Q: Yikes. How do I protect my computer? > A: The version of Java that runs on most consumer PCs includes a browser > plug-in. According to researchers at Carnegie Mellon Universitys CERT, > unplugging the Java plugin from the browser essentially prevents > exploitation > of the vulnerability. Not long ago, disconnecting Java from the browser > was not > straightforward, but with the release of the latest version of Java 7 > Update > 10 Oracle included a very simple method for removing Java from the > browser. > You can find their instructions for doing this here. > Q: How do I know if I have Java installed, and if so, which version? > A: The simplest way is to visit this link and click the Do I have Java > link, > just below the big red Download Java button. > Q: Im using Java 6. Does that mean I dont have to worry about this? > A: There have been conflicting findings on this front. The description of > this > bug at the National Vulnerability Database (NVD), for example, states that > the > vulnerability is present in Java versions going back several years, > including > version 4 and 5. Analysts at vulnerability research firm Immunity say the > bug > could impact Java 6 and possibly earlier versions. But Will Dormann, a > security > expert whos been examining this flaw closely for CERT, said the NVDs > advisory > is incorrect: CERT maintains that this vulnerability stems from a > component that > Oracle introduced with Java 7. Dormann points to a detailed technical > analysis > of the Java flaw by Adam Gowdiak of Security Explorations, a security > research > team that has alerted Java maker Oracle about a large number of flaws in > Java. > Gowdiak says Oracle tried to fix this particular flaw in a previous > update but > failed to address it completely. > Either way, its important not to get too hung up on which versions are > affected, as this could become a moving target. Also, a new zero-day flaw > is > discovered in Java several times a year. Thats why Ive urged readers to > either uninstall Java completely or unplug it from the browser no matter > what > version youre using. > > Q: A site I use often requires the Java plugin to be enabled. What should > I do? > A: You could downgrade to Java 6, but that is not a very good solution. > Oracle > will stop supporting Java 6 at the end of February 2013, and will soon be > transitioning Java 6 users to Java 7 anyway. If you need Java for > specific Web > sites, a better solution is to adopt a two-browser approach. If you > normally > browse the Web with Firefox, for example, consider disabling the Java > plugin in > Firefox, and then using an alternative browser (Chrome, IE9, Safari, > etc.) with > Java enabled to browse only the site(s) that require(s) it. > Q: I am using a Mac, so I should be okay, right? > A: Not exactly. Experts have found that this flaw in Java 7 can be > exploited to > foist malware on Mac and Linux systems, in addition to Microsoft Windows > machines. Java is made to run programs across multiple platforms, which > makes > it especially dangerous when new flaws in it are discovered. For > instance, the > Flashback worm that infected more than 600,000 Macs wiggled into OS X > systems > via a Java flaw. Oracles instructions include advice on how to unplug > Java from > Safari. I should note that Apple has not provided a version of Java for > OS X > beyond 6, but users can still download and install Java 7 on Mac systems. > However, it appears that in response to this threat, Apple has taken > steps to > block Java from running on OS X systems. > Q: I dont browse random sites or visit dodgy porn sites, so I shouldnt > have to > worry about this, correct? > A: Wrong. This vulnerability is mainly being exploited by exploit packs, > which > are crimeware tools made to be stitched into Web sites so that when > visitors > come to the site with vulnerable/outdated browser plugins (like this Java > bug), > the site can silently install malware on the visitors PC. Exploit packs > can be > just as easily stitched into porn sites as they can be inserted into > legitimate, hacked Web sites. All it takes is for the attackers to be > able to > insert one line of code into a compromised Web site. > Q: Ive read in several places that this is the first time that the U.S. > government has urged computer users to remove or wholesale avoid using a > particular piece of software because of a widespread threat. Is this true? > A: Not really. During previous high-alert situations, CERT has advised > Windows > users to avoid using Internet Explorer. In this case, CERT is not really > recommending that users uninstall Java: just that users unplug Java from > their > Web browser. > Q: Im pretty sure that my Windows PC has Java installed, but I cant > seem to > locate the Java Control Panel from the Windows Start Menu or Windows > Control > Panel. What gives? > A: According to CERTs Dormann, due to what appears to potentially be a > bug in > the Java installer, the Java Control Panel applet may be missing on some > Windows systems. In such cases, the Java Control Panel applet may be > launched > by finding and executing javacpl.exe manually. This file is likely to be > found > in C:\Program Files\Java\jre7\bin or C:\Program Files > (x86)\Java\jre7\bin. > Q: I cant remember the last time I used Java, and it doesnt look like I > even > need this program anymore. Should I keep it? > A: Java is not as widely used as it once was, and most users probably can > get > by without having the program installed at all. I have long recommended > that > users remove Java unless they have a specific use for it. If you discover > later > that you really do need Java, it is trivial and free to reinstall it. > Q: This is all well and good advice for consumers, but I manage many PCs > in a > business environment. Is there a way to deploy Java but keep the plugin > disconnected from the browser? > A: CERT advises that system administrators wishing to deploy Java 7 > Update 10 > or later with the Enable Java content in the browser feature disabled > can > invoke the Java installer with the WEB_JAVA=0 command-line option. More > details > are available in the Java documentation. > Q: Okay, I think Im covered on Java. But what about Javascript? > A: Because of the unfortunate similarity of their names, many people > confuse > Java with Javascript. But these are two completely different things. Most > Web > sites use JavaScript, a powerful scripting language that helps make sites > interactive. Unfortunately, a huge percentage of Web-based attacks use > JavaScript tricks to foist malicious software and exploits onto site > visitors. > To protect yourself, it is critically important to have an easy method of > selecting which sites should be allowed to run JavaScript in the browser. > It is > true that selectively allowing JavaScript on known, safe sites wont > block > all malicious scripting attacks: Even legitimate sites sometimes end up > running > malicious code when scammers figure out ways to sneak tainted, bogus ads > into > the major online ad networks. But disallowing JavaScript by default and > selectively enabling it for specific sites remains a much safer option > than > letting all sites run JavaScript unrestricted all the time. > Firefox has many extensions and add-ons that make surfing the Web a safer > experience. One extension that I have found indispensable is NoScript. > This > extension lets the user decide which sites should be allowed to run > JavaScript, > including Flash Player content. Users can choose to allow specific > exceptions > either permanently or for a single browsing session. > Chrome also includes similar script- and Flash blocking functionality that > seems designed to minimize some of these challenges by providing fewer > options. > If you tell Chrome to block JavaScript on all sites by default, when you > browse > to a site that uses JavaScript, the upper right corner of the browser > displays > a box with a red X through it. If you click that and select Always > allow > JavaScript on [site name] it will permanently enable JavaScript for that > site, > but it doesnt give you the option to block third-party JavaScript > content on > the site as Noscript does. In my testing, I had to manually refresh the > page > before Chrome allowed scripting on a site that Id just whitelisted. In > addition, there is a very handy add-on for Chrome called NotScripts that > works > very much like Noscript. > Selectively script blocking can take some getting used to. Most > script-blocking > add-ons will disable scripting by default on Web sites that you have not > added > to your trusted list. In some cases, it may take multiple tries to get a > site > that makes heavy use of Javascript to load properly. > Internet Explorer allows users to block scripts, but even the latest > version of > IE still doesnt give the user much choice in handling JavaScript. In > IE9, you > can select among JavaScript on, off, or prompting you to load JavaScript. > Turning JavaScript off isnt much of an option, but leaving it completely > open > is unsafe. Choosing the Prompt option does nothing but serve incessant > pop-up > prompts to allow or disallow scripts (see the video below). The lack of a > simpler approach to script blocking in IE is one of the main reasons I > continue > to steer readers toward Firefox and Chrome. > > > ------------------------------ > > End of pctechtalk Digest V11 #10 > ******************************** > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Please remember to trim (delete any unrelated text) and adjust the subject > lines of your replies to this digest. > > To unsubscribe or change your email settings: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/pctechtalk > > To access our Archives: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PCTechTalk/messages/ > //www.freelists.org/archives/pctechtalk/ > > To contact only the PCTT Mod Squad, write to: > pctechtalk-moderators@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > To join the PCTableTalk off-topic group, send a blank email to: > pctabletalk+subscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > -------------------------------------------------------- > > -- "We sometimes forget that compassion is not something we get but is a muscle that needs to be exercised..." -Junot Diaz- --------------------------------------------------------------- Please remember to trim your replies (including this sentence and everything below it) and adjust the subject line as necessary. To subscribe, unsubscribe or modify your email settings: //www.freelists.org/webpage/pctechtalk OR To subscribe to the mailing list, send an email to pctechtalk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "subscribe" in the Subject. To unsubscribe send email to pctechtalk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe" in the Subject. To access our Archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PCTechTalk/messages/ //www.freelists.org/archives/pctechtalk/ To contact only the PCTT Mod Squad, write to: pctechtalk-moderators@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To join our separate PCTableTalk off-topic group, send a blank email to: pctabletalk+subscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---------------------------------------------------------------