[patriots] Re: Why believe in God?
- From: "simon kotlowski" <simon.kotlowski@xxxxxxx>
- To: <ukpatriot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Patriots'" <patriots@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 09:51:10 -0000
Everyone who is sceptical about god, Darwinism, please watch tray smith on your
tube the theory of everything.
This guy is anointed.
Also Eli james and professor truth
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yzcKbP0I9TI
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yzcKbP0I9TI&feature=youtu.be> &feature=youtu.be
From: patriots-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:patriots-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Jack Lewis
Sent: 10 February 2015 09:30
To: Patriots
Subject: [patriots] Why believe in God?
Hi John,
Regarding this business of believing in God. Consider it this way - why not
believe in a creator instead. here is a rational reason to do so.
Think about the amount of resources, time and labour that scientists are
putting into robots and artificial intelligence. Huge corporations like Honda
and Sony spend millions and using the finest brains in the discipline to try
and emulate just one or two feature of the human being. If you were to ask one
of these scientists if it would be possible for a robot with human intelligence
if they decided to let their computers develop the programs randomly? In other
words allow random processes to dictate how the robot development continued
without any human intelligence input. What do you think they would say?
And yet these same scientists believed that their own human bodies and brains
did develop in such a way with no intelligent input. This is absolutely
nonsensical! If they went to another planet and saw that it was inhabited by
mechanical machines that could think etc would they assume that they must have
evolved? They would quite rightly assume that a living intelligent creature
must have made them. Why can't they apply the same logic to self replicating
living organisms?
The answer is not a scientific one it is a religious one. They choose to
believe that there was no creator. That is their starting position. After that
they just paint themselves into a corner.
In their determination to prove evolution they are spending billions on sending
probes to Mars in an attempt to clutch at a straw. If they can't discover the
origin of life where there is an abundance of life how can they possibly
discover it in such a far removed way? There is however an advantage to this
kind of exploration and that is they are not actually present themselves and
therefore can speculate in the most outrageous ways knowing that they cannot be
disproved. Also it pays the bills! They are on safe ground - or so they think.
Take it from me John the argument for a creator is water-tight.
Jack
--
www.classicarartist.co.uk
Other related posts:
