Levine's chief of staff, Amy, did put on a blindfold and participate. I wasn't aware of any hesitation Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 24, 2014, at 1:50 PM, Karen Gourgey <karen.gourgey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > Right; the bill is initially from Brewer. Isn't Levine's district her former > district when she was on the Council? > > Anyway, I do think Levine has a real interest in this bill, and when > ebolamania calms down, he could probably be spoken to. We do know his chief > of Staff, who was also present yesterday. Though she was pretty hesitant, I > think she finally did the blindfold thing. > > Lester, advice appreciated on negotiation strategies and timings. > > Karen > > > > Karen Luxton Gourgey, Ed.D. Director > Computer Center for Visually Impaired People > Baruch College, City University of New York > One Bernard Baruch Way Box H-0648 > New York, NY 10010 > Tel: 646 312-1426 > Fax: 646 312-1421 > Visit our website > Follow us on Twitter > Follow us LinkedIn > Join our Meet-ups > Like us on Facebook > Listen to our BlogTalkRadio Podcasts > Subscribe to our YouTube Channel > > -----Original Message----- > From: passcoalition-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:passcoalition-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Annalyn > Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 1:43 PM > To: passcoalition@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [passcoalition] Re: number of new APS > > The bill is actually from Gail Brewer if I understand correctly. She can no > longer submit bills to city council because she is no longer a member. As > borough president she can tell a city council member in her borough to submit > a bill for her. Why she asked Levine I don't know. > > I was Levine's "O&M instructor" yesterday. He asked good questions and > seemed to have an interest. I didn't love all the cameras but I did't feel > like just a prop for a photo op . > > Mark Levine might be a little busy with other matters over the next few days. > The doctor with Ebola lives in his district. > > AnnLyn > > > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Oct 24, 2014, at 12:20 PM, "Maria Hansen" <mhansen1@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> I just looked over Lester's post and agree with the 175 number in the bill >> which I will repost below. However, Mr. Levine answered a question in the >> lobby by saying that there would be 150 per year (and it's his bill). >> Maybe the issue of protected turn lanes should be brought up in testimony >> next week? >> Maria >> >> § 19-188 Accessible pedestrian signals program. a. For purposes of >> this section, the following terms shall have the following meanings: >> >> 1. "Accessible pedestrian signal" shall mean a device that communicates >> information about pedestrian signal timing in a nonvisual format. >> >> 2. "Exclusive pedestrian signal" shall mean a pedestrian control >> signal that allows pedestrians an exclusive interval at which to cross while >> traffic is stopped in all directions. >> >> 3. "Leading pedestrian signal" shall mean a pedestrian control signal >> that displays a walk indicator before a green indicator of a traffic control >> signal within the same intersection it is displayed. >> >> 4. "Protected bicycle lane" shall mean a portion of the roadway that has >> been separated for the exclusive use of bicycles. >> >> b. The department shall establish an accessible pedestrian signals >> program. As part of this program, the department shall identify >> intersections where accessible pedestrian signals may be installed >> based on guidelines, including, but not limited to, those set forth in the >> most recent version of the manual on uniform traffic control devices. The >> department, after consultation with the mayor's office for people with >> disabilities and with advocates for and members of the visually impaired >> community, shall identify intersections which reflect the greatest crossing >> difficulty for persons with visual impairments. >> Commencing in 2012, the department shall annually install, based on >> such guidelines, an accessible pedestrian signal at each corner of >> twenty-five intersections identified by the department following such >> consultation. In addition, the department shall install an accessible >> pedestrian signal at all corners of a minimum of one hundred >> intersections where the department plans to install a protected bicycle >> lane, an exclusive pedestrian signal or leading pedestrian signal. On an >> annual basis, commencing in 2015, the department shall also install an >> accessible pedestrian signal at all corners of any intersection where a >> protected bicycle lane, an exclusive pedestrian signal or leading pedestrian >> signal was installed prior to the effective date of the local law that >> amended this section, at a minimum of fifty such intersections per year >> until such time as all such intersections have such signals. >> >> [b] c. On or before November 30, 2012, and on or before every >> November 30 thereafter, the department shall post on its website a >> report analyzing the status of the accessible pedestrian signals >> program which shall include, but not be limited to, a detailed assessment of >> the program including cost, funding sources for such program including, but >> not limited to city, state and federal funding, recommendations for >> improvements to such program, availability of new technology that may be >> employed by the department for use in such program and any additional >> intersections in the city that may warrant inclusion in such program. >> In addition, such report shall list the fifty top ranked intersections >> for new accessible pedestrian signals, as evaluated by the department >> after consultation with the mayor's office for people with disabilities and >> with advocates for and members of the visually impaired community, based on >> the criteria set forth in subdivision a of this section. >> >> [c] d. The department shall post on its website the locations of all >> such accessible pedestrian signals, disaggregated by community district and >> council district. >