Re: want to stop analyze once the database is stable
- From: "zhu chao" <zhuchao@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: "Mogens Nørrgaard" <mln@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 21:56:16 +0800
Thanks Wolfgang, Morgens and all others. Thanks for backing up me
with my proposal with good reasons!
Actually the application is CSG Kenan application. Per our PD guys
vendor ask us not to stop the analyze code, so management would not
like to make change to current case, though it is causing problems for
us!
Anyone else using Kenan system in the list?
On 4/3/06, Mogens Nørrgaard <mln@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Amen.
>
> If something works, don't change it.
> If something changes for the better, be happy.
> If something changes for the worse, investigate it.
>
> Changing statistics, parameters, source code and dictionary information are
> all de-stabilising activities that people should engage in only when forced
> to, and when they know that they're involved in Communist activities, haha.
>
> Mogens
>
>
> Alex Gorbachev wrote:
> In my experience, if you need STABLE environment - use option (b) and this
> is our preferred option. In fact, we prefer to have statistic change to be
> part of our software development cycle (with some exceptions as mentioned
> already).
>
> 2006/4/2, Wolfgang Breitling <breitliw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > I HAVE to reply to this ( and you know it and maybe even counted on it :-)
> ).
> > The way I see it, you have two choices:
> >
> > a) Do the daily analyze and then deal with the problems it causes
> > b) NOT do the daily analyze and then deal with the problems IT causes
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Alex Gorbachev
>
--
Regards
Zhu Chao
www.cnoug.org
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
