Re: tim= values in trace file
- From: Paul Baumgartel <paul.baumgartel@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Wolfgang Breitling <breitliw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 20:21:13 -0500
Sorry about that--Windows 2000.
On 1/5/06, Wolfgang Breitling <breitliw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> As usual, the first respone (question) is - What platform??
>
> Paul Baumgartel wrote:
>
> > Do the timestamp values in Oracle10g trace files wrap? Note in the
> > following that the timestamp of all of the fetch calls is less than that
> > of the exec call.
> >
> > This particular query did in fact run for around 20 minutes; I'm trying
> > to determine whether the CPU or elapsed value on the first FETCH call
> > is correct (they can't both be correct, as the CPU is around double the
> > elapsed).
> >
>
> --
> Regards
>
> Wolfgang Breitling
> Centrex Consulting Corporation
> www.centrexcc.com
>
--
Paul Baumgartel
paul.baumgartel@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Other related posts:
