RE: stdby and Oracle licensing
- From: "Powell, Mark D" <mark.powell@xxxxxxx>
- To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 16:41:38 -0500
The failover database pricing has been this way for years. But finding
the official document on Oracle's web site is not always easy and I lost
the link. The link was posted on this list just a couple of months
back.
HTH -- Mark D Powell --
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 4:24 PM
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: stdby and Oracle licensing
Thanks.
I really do understand this and that Oracle is now embracing this as the
gospel.
Is this a recent change as I am 99.99% sure that it did'nt always used
to be this way and that under EE one got standby that one did not have
to pay in addition for so long as it was'nt open and used for some
number of hours.
--
..
David
>
>> This is actually (surprisingly) straight-forward.
>> Probably one of the few things related to oracle Oracle licensing
>> that is...
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
