On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 6:00 PM, Rich Jesse <rjoralist2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Ray writes: > >> infoworld say this bug is really ugly. > > Well that certainly does sound potentially ugly. And it describes the > reason behind the 16K/s transaction limitation that was discussed here a few > years back. > > At least I have my SCN growth patterns for about a year now and we won't > even hit 80B in the next 10 years. At current rates. Provided nothing else > changes. Ever... I think it is ugly - I was able to prepare new XE database with quite huge SCN (MOS check from [ID 1393363.1] reported Result: C - SCN Headroom is low) and after that simple DB link allow me to propagate that SCN to other database using user account. regards, -- Marcin Przepiorowski http://oracleprof.blogspot.com -- //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l