RE: filesystemio_options setting

  • From: "Herring Dave - dherri" <Dave.Herring@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <john40855@xxxxxxxxx>, <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 06:50:32 -0500

We ran into a related problem on RHEL 4 and  After changing from 
ASYNCH to SETALL, after some amount of time CTAS statements were dragging along 
at 50 MB/s.  After changing back to ASYNCH the same statements ran at 400 MB/s. 
 Changing back again to SETALL caused those same statements, after running for 
x amount of time, to gradually drop again to 50 MB/s.  

I've never had time to fully investigate this, so I can't say for sure that 
SETALL was the culprit but it sure seemed that way after a few, basic tests.  
This behavior is opposite of what I would have expected, as it seemed that the 
addition of DIRECTIO seemed to slowly fill up something, killing throughput.  
Yet DIRECTIO should be bypassing filesystem cache so it shouldn't be affected 
by any memory-related setting.  Trying to explain this now has me REALLY 
curious as to what was happening.  Great, more work!


Dave Herring, DBA |   A c x i o m  M I C S / C S O
630-944-4762 office | 630-430-5988 wireless | 630-944-4989 fax
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of John Smith
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 10:19 PM
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: filesystemio_options setting

Hi.  We are running oracle on our test evironment in suse 9.   Emc 
symmetrix storage.  I was going over the settings and discovered that 
filesystemio_options was not set (no value given).  I changed it to setall per 
the Oracle documentation for Linux.  Shortly after that, our queries suddenly 
started running longer, and the culprit appears to be disk IO.  

I understood that this setting could not cause a problem, and all the Oracle 
documentation I could find said to set this value to setall in  I 
unset the value and the problem went away. Can someone shed some light on this?
The information contained in this communication is confidential, is
intended only for the use of the recipient named above, and may be
legally privileged.

If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this
communication is strictly prohibited.

If you have received this communication in error, please resend this
communication to the sender and delete the original message or any copy
of it from your computer system.

Thank you.


Other related posts: