Re: enabling dnfs when it's not being used
- From: Martin Berger <martin.a.berger@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Jeremy Schneider <jeremy.schneider@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 15:15:57 +0100
As long as you do not need any other ODM library in those setups I assume
it just doesn't matter.
If the code is not used at all, only the mapped .so in memory might differ
in size. But I hope you do not need those few kb saved.
Martin
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Jeremy Schneider <
jeremy.schneider@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> does anyone know any downsides to enabling dnfs when it's not being
> used? (i.e. the db is using regular local filesystem and/or ASM.)
>
> context is that i create standard builds which get cloned to a whole
> bunch of environments. i have a few environments that use dNFS and
> i'm thinking about just enabling it by default in my standard build
> that gets pushed everywhere. my heaviest workload environments don't
> use dNFS and currently it's not enabled on those homes; i'm wondering
> if there would be any potential risk to enabling it there.
>
> -Jeremy
>
> --
> http://about.me/jeremy_schneider
> --
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>
Other related posts:
