RE: Timestamp of an SCN
- From: "Pete Sharman" <peter.sharman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "dubey.sandeep@xxxxxxxxx" <dubey.sandeep@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 06:41:32 +1100
OK, now you've confused me - not hard to do! :)
Let me see if I have this right. You have a primary site at location X and a
standby at location Y. You have no access from X to Y. How are you getting
the logs from X to Y then? Carrier pigeon? ;)
The only way I can see that working is if you have some way of getting the
files - tape or whatever - and then you apply them at the standby. If that's
the case, then not only is delay in transfer and apply acceptable, so too must
data loss be. That doesn't sound like a Good Idea (TM).
Can you clarify my confusion, please?
Pete
"Controlling developers is like herding cats."
Kevin Loney, Oracle DBA Handbook
"Oh no, it's not. It's much harder than that!"
Bruce Pihlamae, long-term Oracle DBA
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Sandeep Dubey
Sent: Friday, 10 February 2006 6:24 AM
To: Pete Sharman
Cc: Chris Stephens; oracle list; Peter Ross Sharman
Subject: Re: Timestamp of an SCN
I have to provide a DR to a cusotmer's production (primary) database.
Primary is not in our secured physical location, we can not proivde
access and sqlnet from primary to DR. Hence we have to pull from
standby and not push from primary. Delay in transfer and apply is
acceptable under given control.
Sandeep
On 2/9/06, Pete Sharman <peter.sharman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> One has to ask why you are running in non-managed mode anyway?
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
