G'day! In addition to my previous response, here's data from this morning. As I see it, the total (relevant) memory usage is about 12GB. I resize the memory target to 16G and I receive the "Cannot Shrink" error. Am I missing something obvious here? 09:43:13 [16-JAN-2013_09:43:13][SYS@mydb]$ / COMPONENT | CURRENT_SIZE| MIN_SIZE| MAX_SIZE|USER_SPECIFIED_SIZE|OPER_COUNT|LAST_OPER_TYP|LAST_OPER|LAST_OPER_TIME |GRANULE_SIZE =========================|======================|==========|======================|===================|==========|=============|=========|====================|============ shared pool | 1,342,177,280|1140850688| 1,409,286,144| 1073741824| 64|SHRINK |DEFERRED |15-JAN-2013_16:43:55| 67108864 large pool | 134,217,728| 67108864| 134,217,728| 134217728| 1|GROW |MANUAL |15-JAN-2013_16:27:22| 67108864 java pool | 268,435,456| 67108864| 268,435,456| 268435456| 3|GROW |IMMEDIATE|12-JAN-2013_11:05:05| 67108864 streams pool | 134,217,728| 67108864| 134,217,728| 134217728| 1|GROW |MANUAL |15-JAN-2013_16:27:29| 67108864 SGA Target | 4,898,947,072|4898947072| 4,898,947,072| 0| 0|STATIC | | | 67108864 DEFAULT buffer cache | 2,885,681,152|2818572288| 3,355,443,200| 0| 69|GROW |DEFERRED |15-JAN-2013_16:43:55| 67108864 KEEP buffer cache | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0|STATIC | | | 67108864 RECYCLE buffer cache | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0|STATIC | | | 67108864 DEFAULT 2K buffer cache | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0|STATIC | | | 67108864 DEFAULT 4K buffer cache | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0|STATIC | | | 67108864 DEFAULT 8K buffer cache | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0|STATIC | | | 67108864 DEFAULT 16K buffer cache | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0|STATIC | | | 67108864 DEFAULT 32K buffer cache | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0|STATIC | | | 67108864 Shared IO Pool | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0|STATIC | | | 67108864 PGA Target | 2,617,245,696|2617245696| 2,617,245,696| 0| 0|STATIC | | | 67108864 ASM Buffer Cache | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0|STATIC | | | 67108864 |----------------------| |----------------------| | | | | | *sum | 12,280,922,112| | 12,817,793,024| | | | | |* 16 rows selected. Elapsed: 00:00:00.01 09:43:14 [16-JAN-2013_09:43:14][SYS@mydb]$ alter system set memory_target = *16G*; alter system set memory_target = *16G* * ERROR at line 1: ORA-02097: parameter cannot be modified because specified value is invalid ORA-00846: could not *shrink* MEMORY_TARGET to specified value Elapsed: 00:02:00.37 09:45:38 [16-JAN-2013_09:45:38][SYS@mydb]$ sho parameter target NAME |TYPE |VALUE ====================================|================================|============================== archive_lag_target |integer |0 db_flashback_retention_target |integer |10080 fast_start_io_target |integer |0 fast_start_mttr_target |integer |0 memory_max_target |big integer |20G memory_target |big integer |7G parallel_servers_target |integer |256 pga_aggregate_target |big integer |0 sga_target |big integer |0 Thanks, Tony On 16/01/13 9:05 AM, De DBA wrote: > Ah, I should have added that I did check V$memory_resize_ops and > v$memory_dynamic_components and the total memory usage at the time that > I could see was only around 6GB, well under the target of 7G that was in > force. > > I understand that Oracle means target, not limit, which is why I did not > expect any immediate resizing when changing the target. Perhaps I > misunderstand the meaning of "target"? In my understanding it means that > Oracle should attempt to bring memory usage up/down if possible. What I > gather from the answers though, is that Oracle attempts to force memory > down into the new target and refuses to set that target if it > momentarily fails to do that. That would indicate that Oracle treats the > "target" as a hard limit, imho. > > I noticed a similar target=limit behaviour with memory_target and > memory_max_target. We did at one point require more than 7G, and > although memory_max_target was 20G and used memory (SGA + PGA) at 7G, > Oracle raised ORA-4031 instead of growing memory beyond 7G (which is why > we want to resize to 16G in the first place). > > Cheers, > Tony > > <snip> -- //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l