Re: Shared pool from 8i to 9i
- From: Wolfgang Breitling <breitliw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Paula_Stankus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 12:53:50 -0700
That was what I was wondering. I have worked with Peoplesoft
applications for for the past 10+ years and I have never run into shared
pool memory (4031) problems and I keep the shared pool deliberately
rather small since Peoplesoft is not very good at cursor sharing.
I know that's not the OP's question, but the answer depends a lot on the
type of application. If it uses Java or lots of PL/SQL code the shared
pool footprint may very well change from 8i to 9i. But more than 4-fold
seems excessive.
Paula_Stankus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Guys,
>
> How do the longs factor into the problem with shared pool?? =20
>
--
Regards
Wolfgang Breitling
Centrex Consulting Corporation
www.centrexcc.com
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
