Re: Parallel update on non-partitioned tables - allowed at 10/11g?
- From: Greg Rahn <greg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: cam <kadmon@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 14:09:58 -0800
If you want to save the time, I work for Oracle and I confirmed my
statements with developers in the parallel execution group.
Feel free to file an SR if you wish.
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 2:06 PM, cam <kadmon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thanks for taking the time Greg.
>
> I am at the point of running a test case myself and, as soon as I can
> get into MOS (about which the less said, the better..), raise an SR to
> get a definitive answer from Oracle. Not that I don't believe your
> test case, but I'd like to have them admit the docs are 2 major
> versions out of date...
--
Regards,
Greg Rahn
http://structureddata.org
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
