Re: PL/SQL vs Java speed in 10g
- From: Paul Drake <discgolfdba@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2004 20:51:29 -0800 (PST)
--- Jared Still <jkstill@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It seemed a ludicrous statement the first time I
> heard it.
like, "Client/Server is dead?"
Pd
> I don't even pay attention to it anymore.
>
> Jared
>
> On Fri, 2004-02-06 at 22:40, Tim Gorman wrote:
> > Why would Oracle claim that PL/SQL is dead when
> all Java stored procedures
> > have to be encapsulated in PL/SQL wrappers?
> >
> >
> >
> > on 2/6/04 3:30 PM, Jesse, Rich at
> Rich.Jesse@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >
> > > Just reading the whitepaper "PL/SQL Just Got
> Faster" from OTN, it seems like
> > > Oracle's done a fair amount of efficiency tuning
> of PL/SQL in 10g, both in
> > > math and in the code generator / PVM. For
> example, integer math has been
> > > moved from software libraries to hardware ops,
> resulting in a 2.5 - 3 times
> > > improvement in integer math speed (according to
> the paper).
> > >
> > > So has Oracle abandoned it's pre-10g stance of
> "PL/SQL is dead -- convert to
> > > Java"?
> > >
> > > Just curious if anyone's done any perf testing
> yet...
> > >
> > > Rich
> > >
> > > Rich Jesse
> System/Database Administrator
> > > rich.jesse@xxxxxxxxxxxx QuadTech,
> Sussex, WI USA
> > >
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online.
http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Other related posts:
