Re: "Oracle's [multi-core] pricing ...simple and flexible"
- From: Paul Baumgartel <paul.baumgartel@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 14:09:20 -0400
The way I figured it (based on 64-bit dual-core Opteron, which is
supposed to give 50% better performance than single-core), the license
cost is now commensurate with performance.
1 dual-core CPU = 1.5 CPU performance
1 dual-core CPU = 1.5 CPU license cost (2 x .75 CPU)
--
Paul Baumgartel
paul.baumgartel@xxxxxxxxxxxx
On 7/15/05, William B Ferguson <wbfergus@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hmmm. Using the example below then, 12 cores equals the same 'processor'
> license as 11 cores?
>
> It's probably another set of licensing, but does this mean if we went with a
> 12 machine RAC, we'd only get counted as having 9 'cores', or would we
> actually then get counted for 12 'processors'?
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Bill Ferguson
> U.S. Geological Survey - Minerals Information Team
> PO Box 25046, MS-750
> Denver, Colorado 80225
> Voice (303)236-8747 ext. 321 Fax (303)236-4208
>
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
