Re: Oracle Enterprise Linux and Linux Standard Base (LSB)
- From: Ray Stell <stellr@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Jared Still <jkstill@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 12:03:09 -0400
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 06:18:01PM -0700, Jared Still wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Tim Hall <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Frtis:
> >
> > I agree entirely. If some of the press actually took stock of the volume of
> > code Oracle has released into the Linux kernel perhaps they would stop
> > bitching for a few seconds to say thanks.
>
>
> If the press wants to see some kind of documentation of what was done,
> and some type of benchmark showing the improvements, I would have
> to agree with them.
I'm concerned about the future of RHEL support. I lived through the
ups and downs or solaris "support." It was painful. They claimed to
support it and it was was not pretty. I dumped solaris years ago
because of this. I've been wondering since Larry began rattling the linux
sabber if I would be forced into the Oracle OS offerings for santiy sake.
I'll go if I have to even though the cost will be painful, but I just want
to know if I have to and not have to find out the hard way. Is this
concern baseless in your opinion?
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
