Tom Woods (not Kyte :) had an excellence discussion lately on the economics of writing books. No interest here in writing a book but the discussion was very interesting to me. Google Tom Woods Show Archives to find it. On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Hans Forbrich <fuzzy.graybeard@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > There are 2 basic reasons TO write a book > > 1) Actually learn what is being discussed > 2) Marketing value > > Other than that, it is a pile of work, and few people set their own > expectations correctly. > /Hans > > > On 06/10/2014 10:59 AM, Iggy Fernandez wrote: > > re: write because they like it. More like they did not realize how much > effort was involved, how few copies would sell, how extensively their book > would be pirated, how little they would earn in royalties, how hurtful the > reviews can be, that the schedule is what matters most to the publisher, > etc. At least that's what I did not realize. My advice to all those who ask > me how to become an author is "don't." > > But if there's anybody who have read all my advice and are still want to > write a technical book, feel free to contact me and I'll guide you through > the process. > > Iggy > > > ------------------------------ > Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2014 11:58:18 -0400 > Subject: Re: OT: Reasons to NOT write an Oracle book > From: oracledbaquestions@xxxxxxxxx > To: iggy_fernandez@xxxxxxxxxxx > CC: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > I think most authors are consultants. The returns come from the marketing > people get for writing the books. I have been reading alot of novelist > author blogs the last few years for fun. Authors in general don't make much > money. Most work full time and write because they like it. I get the vibe > that many if not the majority may earn less than minimum wage on their > publishing. One interesting tidbit from some author blogs is that there > were number of cases of 'business type' books shooting to the top of the > New York Times bestseller list than disappearing. Apparently consultants > would pay a service to buy their books so they could use it for marketing. > NYT bestseller list had to change how they calculate these kinds of > bestsellers. It worked with niche books like this due to the low volume of > sales. Too bad there isn't a technical book bestseller list... if there > were we could team up, copy and paste stuff from the docs, pay service to > get us to #1 and then raise our rates? > > My understanding is that the top 3 books on the NY Times bestseller list > earn more than the rest of the bestseller list combined and the bestseller > list out earns the next 3 million books combined. > > On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Iggy Fernandez < > iggy_fernandez@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Dear list, > > I've revising my beginner DBA book for 12c and can' t help thinking about > the reasons to NOT write a book. Here are a few. > > > - It's not worth the effort. The market is saturated with books; so > much information is available online that nobody buys many books nowadays; > your book will be pirated on the day it is published; it will be obsolete > very quickly; prices are low unlike college textbooks and much lower in > emerging markets; the royalty is 10% of the wholesale price--not the list > price--and has to be shared by all the co-authors. You'll be lucky if your > book sells 5000 copies over a five-year period. Assuming that the list > price is $40 and the wholesale price is $20 and that you have one > co-author, and that you spent 500 hours writing and researching, you are > literally getting paid minimum wage for your effort. Writer beware. > > > > - You will make terrible mistakes that will haunt you for ever. In my > case, I made a horrible mistake on page 22 of my book that was soon > discovered by a beginner who was testing every line of code for himself. > > > > - Some of the reviews will make you cringe. You will wish that you had > reviewers BEFORE you finished the book, not after the book was printed. > > > > - To you work and family commitments come first but, to the publisher, > the book comes first. To you quality is everything but, to the > publisher, the schedule is more important and I quote *"**It is better > to go to market first with a good enough book than to be months late with a > perfect book. A successful good enough book can be improved in a second > edition. A failed perfect book is simply a failure. Schedule matters to > your publisher. Variable pay is the norm. Missed quarterly and yearly > targets can cost your editor and others whom you work with hundreds, even a > few thousands of dollars. Those same missed targets hurt the business > too."* > > > On the plus side, you can send a copy to your mom and she will show it > to all her friends. > > That off my chest, I would appreciate any help in reviewing the first > drafts so that I can put out a better book. Comments on accuracy as well as > clarity and readability would be very welcome. I will post the finished > chapters to Google Docs so that anybody can make comments inline. I will be > very grateful for help and will acknowledge all those who helped in the > preface. Please let me know if you can help. > > Kindest regards, > Iggy > > > >