This does feel to me like going back in time now. Like Mark Bobak first ran 9i RAC (9.2.0.3) on Solaris with Veritas Storage Foundation for Oracle RAC. Moving to 10.1 and having 2 cluseterware managers running was the biggest pain imaginable. Was glad to ditch the veritas and have a single stack when I did a solaris -> linux migration (moving to 10.2 at the same time). Though veritas did work and was pretty robust, by 10.1 it was just getting in the way. Could not imagine running RAC with 3rd party clusterware now. 10gR2 clusterware has proved to be very stable in my environment. We will soon see if the massive changes in 11gR2 clusterware prove as equally stable. jason. -- http://jarneil.wordpress.com On 26 February 2010 17:51, Martin Bach <development@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Dear listers, > > my first contact with RAC was with Oracle 10.1.0.3. It had all the bells and > whistles for deployment out of the box already, especially since my platform > of choice was Linux. There simply was no need to look for third party > clusterware or clustered file systems that I possibly couldn't get my hands > on anyway. > > I participated in some serious load testing carried out in Montpellier, but > purely from a database point of view-if memory serves me right then the > infrastructure was p-Series AIX 5.3 with HACMP and GPFS... Not that I have > seen it though :( > > So here's my question-how did you deploy RAC (don't care about the platform) > in the 9i days? Which software did you use to provide all the services we > take for granted with Clusterware/Grid Infrastructure? > > Or even more interestingly-who out there is still using additional cluster > software for RAC? And which additional benefit do you get that your platform > doesn't provide? > > Thanks all in advance for sharing! > > Martin > -- > Martin Bach > OCM 10g > http://martincarstenbach.wordpress.com > http://www.linkedin.com/in/martincarstenbach > -- > //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l > > > -- //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l