RE: Going multicore, Sun Fire T2000 (8 cores)

  • From: "Jesse, Rich" <Rich.Jesse@xxxxxx>
  • To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 13:19:57 -0600

Ditto.  The problem for me is coming up with a scheme to use all those
cores simultaneously, or near to it.  I'm using 9.2.0.7 on Solaris 10,
since that's closest to our production.
 
Rich

        -----Original Message-----
        From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Michael McMullen
        Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 12:18 PM
        To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
        Subject: Re: Going multicore, Sun Fire T2000 (8 cores)
        
        
        I'm doing this right now. 1 cpu 8 cores 4 threads per core.
Oracle sees it as 32 cpu. To me it looks like a big single point of
failure. This is supposed to replace our E6500. I think the E6500 cost
us close to a million bucks (including T3 misc hardware). What's the
price of a T2000 a couple of grand. The decision on server was not mine
to make.
         
        Mike

                ----- Original Message ----- 
                From: Vlad Sadilovskiy <mailto:vlovsky@xxxxxxxxx>  
                To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
                Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 12:32 PM
                Subject: Going multicore, Sun Fire T2000 (8 cores)

                Hello,
                 
                We are currently evaluating hw replacement: Sun Fire 440
4 processors -> T2000 8 cores.
                 
                I'd appreciate if anybody could share his/her experience
of moving DBs from Sun Fire 440 to T2000, or benchmark comparison for
Oracle9i, 10g?
                 
                Thanks a ton.
                 
                - Vladimir

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. oracle-l
  3. Archive
  4. 03-2006