Re: Going multicore, Sun Fire T2000 (8 cores)
- From: "Alex Gorbachev" <gorbyx@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: mln@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 21:22:52 +0200
Which will move you "knee" higher according to Cary (to queuing theory to be
more precise)... right? ;-)
2006/3/27, Mogens Nørrgaard <mln@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
>
> If we're talking the T1 8-core Sun processor, it's 0.25, meaning one of
> them costs 2xCPU price. I still don't know why. It's either a very slow
> 8-way or Oracle is trying to help Sun from going down.
>
> There could be cases, though, where having many slow cores would be more
> interesting than few fast cores - right, Cary? Cary?!?
>
> Mogens
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Alex Gorbachev
Other related posts:
- » Going multicore, Sun Fire T2000 (8 cores)
- » Re: Going multicore, Sun Fire T2000 (8 cores)
- » RE: Going multicore, Sun Fire T2000 (8 cores)
- » RE: Going multicore, Sun Fire T2000 (8 cores)
- » Re: Going multicore, Sun Fire T2000 (8 cores)
- » RE: Going multicore, Sun Fire T2000 (8 cores)
- » RE: Going multicore, Sun Fire T2000 (8 cores)
- » RE: Going multicore, Sun Fire T2000 (8 cores)
- » Re: Going multicore, Sun Fire T2000 (8 cores)
- » Re: Going multicore, Sun Fire T2000 (8 cores)
- » Re: Going multicore, Sun Fire T2000 (8 cores)
- » Re: Going multicore, Sun Fire T2000 (8 cores)
- » RE: Going multicore, Sun Fire T2000 (8 cores)
- » RE: Going multicore, Sun Fire T2000 (8 cores)
- » RE: Going multicore, Sun Fire T2000 (8 cores)
- » Re: Going multicore, Sun Fire T2000 (8 cores)