Exadata high capacity vs high prformance drives
- From: "Stephens, Chris" <Chris.Stephens@xxxxxxx>
- To: "'oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 14:47:33 -0600
After reading through a decent amount of information on Kevin Closson's site,
it seems pretty convincing that there is a mismatch between the ability of
Exadata's compute nodes to process data at the same rate that the storage nodes
can serve up. Obviously that is somewhat dependent on individual workloads.
Given that, are sites tending to go with the high capacity drives in the
storage nodes?
I know that is a very general question that might get a lot of 'it depends'
answers but I'm trying to figure out how to decide between the two without
actually knowing what the workload is going to be. I'm just being asked to
make a best guess at this point.
Thanks for any comments.
Chris
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is
addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and
exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is
not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering
this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us
immediately by email reply.
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
