RE: OCFS2 certified with EL 6 (RH or Oracle) ?
- From: <Christopher.Taylor2@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 13:11:34 -0600
That's basically the understanding I had - I was curious if RH has done any
builds themselves and since I don't have a RH service subscription I can't
verify for myself. I'm betting they haven't done anything with it but wanted
to verify.
Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: timseanhall@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:timseanhall@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tim Hall
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 1:04 PM
To: Taylor Christopher - Nashville
Cc: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: OCFS2 certified with EL 6 (RH or Oracle) ?
Last I heard, Oracle were saying something like, they are not going to do the
work for RHEL to maintain OCFS2 and ASMLib against the RHEL kernel anymore.
SUSE already do this job themselves, so why should Oracle continue to do it for
Red Hat? The source is available for RHEL to do it themselves, and by all
accounts it is not a big task, so it's really down to RHEL whether that want
their customers to have access to OCFS2 and ASMLib. It's not the big-bad-Oracle
pulling the plug. If SUSE can do it, which they do, is really a big problem for
RHEL?
Of course, we should all assume it is a big conspiracy. It's more fun that way.
:)
Cheers
Tim...
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
