Re: English semantics help needed
- From: saurabh manroy <saurabhmanroy@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Laimutis.Nedzinskas@xxxxxx, oracle-l <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 12:22:33 +0100
>> the patch does not fix the corruption. It only makes sure the redo/archive
>> logs are cleaned from this corruption so that backups/standby work.
No,
From the note 7662491.8:
"The fix prevents this corruption to be introduced in the redo and
*will not fix any existent* corruption that is already introduced in
the redo/archived logs. Meaning that if the patch is installed and a
recovery is attempted again using the same archived logs, the error
will be still produced."
>> select from table would still give an error, wouldn't it ?
Yes,Patch wouldn't fix anything that is already corrupt. Note suggests
to use dbms_repair to skip corrupt blocks.
>> There is no fix for the root cause ?
Patch would fix the rootcause but that would be of help only in future.
Regards,
Saurabh Manroy
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:02 PM, <Laimutis.Nedzinskas@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Bug 7662491 - Array Update can corrupt a row. ORA-600 [kghstack_free1]
> ORA-600 [kddummy_blkchk][6110/6129] [ID 861965.1]
>
> Hi listers
>
> I have problem reading the metalink Bug 7662491 and especially patch
> 7662491. Btw, we had a similar issue meaning this is not a theoretical
> interest of mine.
>
> Do I interpret the note correctly:
>
> the patch does not fix the corruption. It only makes sure the redo/archive
> logs are cleaned from this corruption so that backups/standby work.
> select from table would still give an error, wouldn't it ?
> There is no fix for the root cause ?
>
>
> Brgds, Laimis N
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
>
> --
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
