Re: Duplicate timestamp(6): How is this possible?

  • From: Howard Latham <howard.latham@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "Dunbar, Norman (Capgemini)" <norman.dunbar.capgemini@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 10:11:30 +0000

I was always taught to NEVER use TIME as a key. Even if your system works
now what happens if you upgrade the hardware and it is so much faster that
two rows can be inserted with in the granularity of the systems timer?

On 20 January 2011 10:00, Dunbar, Norman (Capgemini) <
norman.dunbar.capgemini@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Morning Howard,
> >> Not that I'm involved in building systems anymore but is
> >> there no longer required to use a sequence to guarantee a
> >> unique id for a record?
> It depends!
> You are just about to start the discussion on the merits of natural as
> opposed to synthetic keys now. :-)
> You would think that a timestamp(6) would be accurate enough to be
> unique for all situations - possibly excepting the flow of data from the
> LHC at CERN perhaps (16 TB daily apparently), but Oracle's TIMESTAMPS
> and TIMESTAMPS WITH TIME ZONEs cause their own problems.
> I'd never use a DATE as a primary key, computers work far too fast to
> allow second resolution to be unique. (Ok, I admit, as a very junior
> COBOL developer on an ICL 2966 mainframe, I did make the mistake of
> using a date as a key!)
> Cheers,
> Norm.
> Norman Dunbar
> Contract Senior Oracle DBA
> Capgemini Database Team (EA)
> Internal : 7 28 2051
> External : 0113 231 2051
> Information in this message may be confidential and may be legally
> privileged. If you have received this message by mistake, please notify the
> sender immediately, delete it and do not copy it to anyone else.
> We have checked this email and its attachments for viruses. But you should
> still check any attachment before opening it.
> We may have to make this message and any reply to it public if asked to
> under the Freedom of Information Act, Data Protection Act or for litigation.
>  Email messages and attachments sent to or from any Environment Agency
> address may also be accessed by someone other than the sender or recipient,
> for business purposes.
> If we have sent you information and you wish to use it please read our
> terms and conditions which you can get by calling us on 08708 506 506.  Find
> out more about the Environment Agency at

Howard A. Latham

Sent from my Nokia N97

Other related posts: