Re: Diskgroups for redo, controlfiles, and temp?

From: Seth Miller <sethmiller.sm@xxxxxxxxx>
To: HerringD@xxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 16:42:10 -0500

Dave,

Have you (or this outside resource) identified any of these files as being
a bottleneck?

"High level" tells me that this change is a solution in need of a problem.

Seth Miller



On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Herring, David <HerringD@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> Folks,
>
> Has anyone ever run into blogs that have demostrated large performance
> gains, when on a SAN, by splitting out redo, controlfiles, and temp onto
> their own diskgroups?  I don't recall ever seeing this as a best practice
> and in this periodic discussion brought up to our group I believe has
> agreed.  I'm getting pressure from an outside resource to split out these
> file types for performance reasons yet haven't received anything specific
> to explain why and the arguments presented have been high level and similar
> to arguments from long ago on older hardware.
>
> Dave Herring
> --
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Diskgroups for redo, controlfiles, and temp?
  - From: Herring, David

References:
- Diskgroups for redo, controlfiles, and temp?
  - From: Herring, David

Re: Diskgroups for redo, controlfiles, and temp?

Other related posts: