Re: {Disarmed} Role transition

  • From: "Senthil Subramanian" <skumar.sen@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "Niall Litchfield" <niall.litchfield@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 19:58:56 -0400

The database is on the EMC storage with BCVs for both primary and standby.
I can sync the BCV with the standby and mount the storage on a different
host.
Once I mount the storage, I can create one more physical standby database.

Using the combination of this new physical standby, restore points, and
flashback database, I can activate the standby and do some of our standard
application checks to make sure the standby is valid.  Once I am satisfied
with the test, I can either put the database in standby mode or unmount the
storage and establish the BCV back to the original standby.  This entire
process would take about 2-3 hours.  I usually conduct this test often when
time permits.  In addition to this, we also have other tests that involve
applications.

In this way, I can mimic the real production environment and say that my DR
plan is sound.

Thanks,

Senthil.


On 10/2/07, Niall Litchfield <niall.litchfield@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 10/2/07, Senthil Subramanian <skumar.sen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Carel-Jan,
> >
> > Thanks for your valuable input on this.
> > I did try switching roles on a small 9i test database back in 2002, but
> > never really implemented in a real production environment.
> > We have a sound DR solution but never got a chance to test and implement
> > the role transition.
>
>
>
> Please don't take this personally - since the above is a fairly common
> thing to happen, but if you never really tested in a real environment then
> how (unless you have recently survived a disaster) do you know you have a
> sound DR solution.
>
> We have a 'sound' fire procedure where I work, when we actually tested it
> about a year back we found it took 8 minutes to evacuate the (3 floor)
> building and 20 to account for everyone. In other words testing the real
> procedure in the real environment showed us some problems. DR is much the
> same. You have to, regularly, test it for it to be worth the monetary
> investment in setting it up.
>
>
>
> --
> Niall Litchfield
> Oracle DBA
> http://www.orawin.info

Other related posts: