Re: Bit OT : diff bet'n business continuity and high availability
- From: Steve Baldwin <stbaldwin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: premj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 22:39:07 +1100
I wonder if HAS is more focussed on local hardware failure/failover (e.g.
RAC) whereas BCS is more geared towards total catastrophic failure - e.g.
tornado levelling data center.
Steve
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 9:57 PM, _JP_ <premj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> List,
>
> (Sorry for this bit OT discussion. Would stop such posts
> in future ... if it is not acceptable on this list)
>
> I was asked (in an interview sometime back): about the difference
> bet'n high availability solution and business continuity solution.
>
> For me - both sound similar except - BCS is from business
> perspective and HAS is from technical perspective.
>
> Is that right ? How would you guys have handled this question ?
>
> Thoughts ?!!
>
> ~ jp ~
>
> <http://sigads.rediff.com/RealMedia/ads/click_nx.ads/www.rediffmail.com/signatureline.htm@Middle?>
Other related posts:
