RE: Be careful about Oracle Licenses
- From: "Goulet, Richard" <Richard.Goulet@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <cicciuxdba@xxxxxxxxx>, <gints.plivna@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 08:51:01 -0400
Alan,
To err is human.
To really louse things up take a Java Program.
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Guillermo Alan Bort
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2011 9:51 AM
To: gints.plivna@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: howard.latham@xxxxxxxxx; ORACLE-L
Subject: Re: Be careful about Oracle Licenses
Funny story/rant about a vendor who doesn't support RAC because they are
too cheap to test their product on it. It turns out they are using a
severly outdated framework that requires the use of the SID in the
JDBCURL and does not support SERVICE_NAME (I don't know why). Now for
the funny... they use that framework for half the application... so we
have RAC for half the application and the rest of the application is
just pointing to a single node...
Sorry for the OT... I just felt like ranting this morning.
Cheers!
Alan.-
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Gints Plivna <gints.plivna@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Actually never heard of such precise restrictions and would like to
see where it is written?
But anyway remember that there exists such things like:
- different editions XE, PE, SE ONE, SE which might or might not be OK
for development (abstracting from story about development (and
test!!!) environment as close as possible to production)
- term licences
Gints Plivna
http://www.gplivna.eu
2011/5/17 Howard Latham <howard.latham@xxxxxxxxx>:
> It seems to be official. You have to buy a Full Oracle License if you
do
> ANY development for more than 90 days
> and/or use more than 1 developer on a box.
>
> --
> Howard A. Latham
>
> Sent from my Nokia N97
>
>
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
