RE: BEWARE 9.2.0.5 64-BIT SOLARIS 2.9
- To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 15:32:09 -0400
Dennis,
Not only patches are released to cheer you up, sometimes they are
released to shut you up as well ... Especially if you have been
complaining long enough ...
Not all patches are cumulative (don't trust Oracle on that one), a bug
identified in 9202 was claimed to be fixed in 9203, but it is still
broken in 9204. Duh !! Either they re-assigned the developer or they
don't like each other.
My opinion only
Raj
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
Rajendra dot Jamadagni at nospamespn dot com
All Views expressed in this email are strictly personal.
select standard_disclaimer from company_requirements;
QOTD: Any clod can have facts, having an opinion is an art !
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of DENNIS WILLIAMS
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 2:10 PM
To: 'oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: RE: BEWARE 9.2.0.5 64-BIT SOLARIS 2.9
Paula
My experience, having worked for software vendors, is that you are
correct. Patchsets generally get a "modest" amount of regression
testing, at best. Just to cheer you up, individual patches may receive
practically no regression testing.
Dennis Williams
DBA
Lifetouch, Inc.
dwilliams@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Other related posts:
