Thanks. And that was the plan. We use dnfs now in environments but not running ASM. On Oct 17, 2014 12:34 PM, "Kevin Jernigan" <kevin.jernigan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > If you're on 11g or higher, you should use Direct NFS (dNFS), not > standard NFS. It will provide significantly better performance, better load > balancing if you have multiple NICs, and transparent failover if you have > multiple NICs and one of the NICs fails...KJ > > -- > Kevin Jernigan > Senior Director Product Management > Advanced Compression, Hybrid Columnar > Compression (HCC), Database File System > (DBFS), SecureFiles, Database Smart Flash > Cache, Total Recall, Database Resource > Manager (DBRM), Direct NFS Client (dNFS), > Continuous Query Notification (CQN), > Index Organized Tables (IOT), Information > Lifecycle Management (ILM)+1-650-607-0392 (o)+1-415-710-8828 (m) > > On 10/17/14, 5:56 AM, Kenny Payton wrote: > > Thanks for your reply, I haven't started any testing yet. Hopefully next > week I get an opportunity to dig a little deeper. > On Oct 16, 2014 11:29 PM, "Seth Miller" <sethmiller.sm@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Kenny, >> >> I'm a little confused by your post. The >> parameter _ASM_ALLOW_ONLY_RAW_DISKS is not required for using ASM with >> files on NFS mounts. The configuration to which you are referring is not >> only common, but the recommended best practice from the Oracle >> documentation. >> >> Have you started any of your testing yet? >> >> Seth Miller >> >> >> On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Kenny Payton <k3nnyp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> Anyone running ASM on file systems? I have a number of databases on >>> Netapp and some on local storage but none of them are also running ASM. >>> I’ll be running some tests in the near future where I will be limited to >>> NFS. I’d like to have some redundancy in my storage layer in addition to >>> what the NFS solution is using on the back end. I will have access to >>> multiple separate NFS arrays and was thinking about using ASM redundancy >>> spanning separate NFS mounts ( from separate arrays ). This is not a >>> common configuration and I’m not sure how supportable this would be >>> considering you have to set a hidden parameter to enable ASM to scan >>> files. I’m curious to hear if anyone is actually using this other than >>> just to play around on a laptop. >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Kenny >>> >>> -- >>> //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l >>> >>> >>> >> >